22 Comments
 

What group? That makes a massive difference. If you're talking REGAL / FIG then I would go with WF in a heartbeat. If you're talking Tech M&A I'd go with Blair. Really in no situation would I go with Baird. 

 

Fairly clear choice of either Blair vs. WF here. For Wells a handful of groups stand out significantly from the rest which are REGAL, Sponsors, Lev-Fin, and E&P. These groups are able to utilize WF's gigantic balance sheet. For Blair, Tech and M&A are its bread and butter but the majority of its groups do well and place well. If you can place into the those top groups at Wells go for it, otherwise the Blair generalist offer is much better, especially if its Tech / M&A. 

 

Yeah, as a former employee it’s always strange when I hear about the sponsors group. That being said, they have made a few key hires in order to turn that group around. Their new head of IB was C level at CS IB for a long time, there have also been MD level hires who seem like they would have some sponsor relationships. These things take a while but I have seen WF in more active roles on some sponsor led deals, some recent lead lefts as well. When I was there I don’t think there was as much sponsors activity but it’s hard to tell what it is like now as the league tables don’t paint the full picture and sponsor activity has obviously slowed a great deal. 

 

I would personally go with WB based off the groups you asked about especially if it’s for Healthcare. As someone mentioned (which I wasn’t familiar on), Blair seems to do really well in Industrials and WF is more financing that pure M&A work. If location is a factor for you (Chicago is big for WB, Charlotte for WF, Atlanta for Truist), something to consider as well, whether it be now or in the future for your career but not sure if you’re willing to disclose the groups / locations for the offers.

Congrats on all the offers though - would love to hear what you decide on

 

Repudiandae debitis incidunt libero ea omnis accusamus deserunt labore. Quia architecto id dicta ad. Necessitatibus aperiam qui fuga facilis.

Quo vero ut voluptates dignissimos. Sint doloribus qui expedita ut itaque et est. Natus magni natus ipsa. Similique ipsam voluptatibus nam autem. Harum quis et id enim nihil provident. Unde autem asperiores non velit temporibus quo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”