Difference in tier 1 and tier 2 in investment banking and tech and quant positions.
Tier S++ (Super Target)
Harvard / Yale / Princeton - HYP
Wharton - UPenn's undergrad business school - 4yrs
Stanford - The most prestigious western school
Tier S+ (Target)
UPenn / Dartmouth / Columbia - Mid-tier Ivies. Non-Wharton UPenn is still a target school
MIT
This is from a post this year and was just wondering from anyone who is a recruiter for IB or quant whether being in S+ would be a disadvantage. I know that it is not a big disadvantage however, I would just like to know what else I could do when attending a tier S+ college that would put me in the same ranks as someone from HYP for example. This goes for quant and IB. Also whether the VC and entrepreneurial side of the colleges is strong in tier S+
Dude please stop, please, for the community we are begging you to stop, PLEASE!
?????
Fuck off
People always say that recruiters mostly one recruit from hypwm soooooo
To be honest, I don’t think you’ll be able to make it into investment banking from a school like Columbia. Recruiters practically regard it, along with Penn (non-W) and MIT, as community colleges. No banker in their right mind would even open your networking email and most have a filter to send every non-HYPSM email to the trash.
Autem fuga dolorem eos velit repellat aut ab. Magni quaerat non a eum et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...