EB vs BB for Post-MBA Tech Banking

Haven't been able to find an answer in the forums, so hopefully my question will help future readers:

I'm grateful to be starting a MBA at a M7 this Fall. For quick reference, my career path so far has been Military > Data Science (in academia and public sector) > Big 4 Tech Strategy Consulting. Post-MBA, I plan to become an industry banker in the tech space in the Bay. For the longest time, I read that GS or MS TMT seemed like the way to go, but it seems that the EB's are making big moves in this space in recent years.

Are there significant advantages of choosing one route over the other (EB v BB)? I plan to either stay in banking for 3-4 years and pivot to Growth Equity, or stay for the rest of my career.

This may come across as selfish, but currently, if I decide to stay in banking long term: company culture, client impact (forging deep relationships to drive my clients strategy), salary, and shortest road to MD are important qualities to me

Thank you for your time. WSO has been very helpful in shaping my career

 

Summering at big bb tech group (MS/GS/JPM).. think the value of being at a huge platform is that you have so many more touch points with clients and can leverage your balance sheet to really start building realationships through other means besides just m&a..seems like my vps have a much easier time meeting clients when they can offer the firm. Just my 2c as an intern.

 

Easier time as compared to...what?

To OP, I’ll be specific to your question. If your goal is growth equity, being able to “offer the firm” doesn’t mean anything. There’s 10 other banks from GS to Wells “offering the firm” but that doesn’t automatically give you a seat at the table for M&A and other under the tent strategic work. And the strategic work is what matters for growth equity, they don’t want to hear about the Term Loan Bs and Senior Secured Notes you got issued last year. To get strategic deal work, you better have a lot more to talk about than capital markets, your firm better come with market intelligence, actionable ideas and connectivity.

As for fastest progression to MD, it’s 3 years associate, 3/4 years VP, and then ? as a Director/ED/MD (title variance depending on back) before the jump to MD/SMD/Partner. The progression up until Director/ED/MD is pretty straight forward so long as (a) you’re alive, (b) you haven’t burned out and quit, (c) there’s still a lightbulb in between your eyes, (d) you put in some effort and (e) your firm isn’t crumbling. The last jump is a ? because it’s about revenue generation at that point so there’s no categorical answer as to whether EB or BB is faster. I can provide plenty of support and rebuttals for both.

Ultimately it’s about the quality of the platform and deal flow. This is not intended to be a league table debate but GS, MS Q, EVR all have good flow and can provide a good platform for either path. Sure there are other banks I’m missing that the prospects/interns will gladly contribute.

 

Company culture depends what you like

Pay as a general rule of thumb, if you’re public and big you get paid less (those pesky shareholders!). If you’re public and smaller, you get paid more than public and big. If you’re private then you’re on the fastest path to Scrooge McDuck status.

Client impact, you can do that at any shop, that’s why companies have house bankers, some are BB and some are EB. You just need to be able to offer market intelligence, actionable ideas, execution and a network. Do more than “ offer the firm”, the truth is debt and equity are commodities and pricing/fees is 1/2 the battle for those products.

 
Most Helpful

If you truly want to cover pure tech, go to a BB because most of the touch points in pure tech come from equity fundraising - which of course primarily happen at big banks. Qatalyst is the best tech M&A shop, if you’re focused in M&A. Pure west coast tech is the only area where I would push someone to do a BB over an EB (except maybe Qatalyst) because in almost every other case, you’re going to get a more hands on experience early on at an EB (especially in regards to M&A, where I’ve yet to meet a BB associate who can run a process - but it’s not completely uncommon, though still not the norm, to see an EB associate do so). So I would think about what you want - do you want to cover technology broadly or do you want a more hands on and technical M&A focused experience? If it’s the industry, I would run for GS/MS.

In terms of your other qualities, culture will be specific to the firm (GS is closer to EVR in culture than MS). Pay will be significantly higher at the EB (I’m talking 100s of thousands of dollars over your associate / VP years - if it took you 8-10 years to make MD I would not be surprised if you told me the EB banker made more than 1mm more over that time period). Path to MD will be the same time period at both (banking is hierarchical). And you’re “impact” will be hard to judge, but will depend more on you’re staffing and the specific senior banker(s) you work for than the firm.

 

Sit labore omnis vel consequatur nobis velit molestias. Illum voluptatem nobis unde dolor. Maxime nam aut aperiam. Vel similique officia fugit perferendis. Labore quam perferendis doloribus ex totam voluptatem neque dolore.

Sint neque nesciunt qui blanditiis porro. Quo nihil quidem vel voluptas non nulla rerum. Adipisci ullam delectus qui temporibus illum impedit sunt.

Sit at eum voluptas. Hic quibusdam expedita cum quaerat maxime officiis cum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”