EV/FCFF multiple

Hey Guys,

I had a quick question about the EV/FCF multiple.

FCF is known to be one of the most ''useful'' tools, as it gives a very clear picture how much cash can be distributed to everyone. That is, after CapEx how much can still be given to equity holders, debt holders and others.

As this is perhaps one of the more interesting and meaningful tools, and more helpful than the Revenues/EBIT/EBITDA - how come it is used so infrequent.

I always hear about EV/Rev, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and other industry specific multiples to be widely used - I was just wondering why EV/FCF is so ''neglected'' and unpopular - as for me it seems to be one of the more interesting and explaining ones.

I was interested in hearing your views on this!

Thanks in advance,

Unlmtd

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Because EV/EBITDA is nice and easy to calculate. If you're doing EV/FCF, you have to take into account not just capex, but working capital changes and cash taxes. A working capital anomaly will really fuck up your multiple. Likewise with capex, you'd have to break out acquisition capex and only take into account maintenance capex, which isnt always straight forward.

Only reason EV/EBIT is used is as a proxy for EV/EBITDA-Capex (with the assumption that annual D&A for a company should equal maintenance capex) but I certainly never use it for valuation purposes.

As for EV/Rev, I tend to use it when valuing a company with negative EBITDA.

 

Explicabo doloremque et tenetur ab. Quibusdam quia modi ex aut. Autem consequatur dolores voluptatem exercitationem. Voluptas nobis possimus explicabo ea quaerat id aut. Nisi soluta aperiam natus ducimus dicta ratione.

Facere maiores culpa rerum quia. Illo laudantium eaque ipsa est. Mollitia earum ratione ut placeat nisi.

Deserunt sint natus et ut. Sint rerum aliquid asperiores et ut officia velit. Corporis repudiandae et commodi odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”