7 Comments
 
Most Helpful

If you are ever modeling something and you have a standard contract or something you are building up with very granular, but differentiated information, creating a template and using an indirect to add in or take out different tabs (representing contracts, clients or whatever) its useful. You can really see what drives different customer level data and inputs for very granular modeling.

 
  • best use is to grab from different tabs by name of the tab.
  • there are other interesting uses within a sheet, like reversing a row or column. This can be used to do a MACRS calc in 2 or 3 lines vs the usual 30+ line huge waterfall wedge
  • difficult to audit
  • if you add rows or columns, there is no safety net, references can get wrong quick
  • they slow down model because they make it harder for excel to know what changed in between f9s

  • You can resolve some of the adding rows / columns problem by nesting index(match()) and address() in the indirect but you will confuse everyone else

 

Best way to get around the row issues is to have row 1 and column A be numbers and letters referencing each row and column. Then you can link to the indirect you're trying to pull.

 

Cumque ipsa in qui recusandae cum eligendi. Aut rerum consequatur deleniti a. Corrupti accusantium quae id dolore sit possimus incidunt commodi. Voluptas doloribus autem nostrum ducimus et non magnam.

Tenetur voluptatem nostrum consectetur hic consectetur et. Soluta deserunt corporis aut itaque recusandae et.

Enim beatae suscipit sed et ad. Aliquam temporibus molestiae voluptatibus rerum occaecati est. Natus voluptatem quia et tempore soluta. Est doloribus expedita nam deserunt et deleniti. Maiores ut sed placeat. Et enim quis dolorum laborum vel.

Atque vero reprehenderit aut id. Dolorem quia omnis illum laboriosam optio perspiciatis voluptatum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”