Funding / Sources and Uses Schedule

When looking to fund a M&A transaction, do you only consider funding the equity portion or do you also include debt?

I have seen some sources and uses schedules from previous transactions and they typically, if not always, include the debt to be acquired but a transaction that I am currently working on, we only consider the equity portion. The rationale is that the debt will simply be taken over by us, the acquirer, and thus does not need to be funded.

Can someone please shed some light on this topic? Please keep it straight forward, i.e. only debt and equity and disregard preferreds, options, transaction costs etc.

4 Comments
 

I'd say that you usually find a change of control clause for debt and in this case you would need to refinance it. Maybe that's not the case in your transaction?

 

Thanks for your quick reply.

But even if we refinance the debt wouldnt that just be raising new debt to pay down the existing debt, i.e. no net effect? The result is still the same, i.e. the target's debt, in one form or another, go on our BS? I would agree that we would have to include debt if we decided to pay down the target's debt, without raising new debt, but that is essentially the same as deleveraging, right?

 

If you refi the existing debt then you're using some new funding source to accomplish that refi, thus you include the refi in your Uses table. Yes, the same amount of debt (or mix of debt/contributed equity) is on your BS, but it's a completely different facility with different characteristics. If you do keep the legacy debt, treat it as you would a new debt facility, just model out payments, interest, etc. based on the facility(ies) terms.

Regardless, it's pretty rare to not refinance the existing debt. You not only have change of control clauses as above poster mentioned but keeping legacy debt complicates things with new lenders - primarily seniority & covenants.

 

Dolor consequatur repellat libero nesciunt ratione. Odio quibusdam dolores omnis nobis. Fugiat aspernatur necessitatibus autem earum esse eligendi consequatur.

Quaerat modi sint voluptas rerum perspiciatis. Eius facilis nulla error ipsam sed. Sit omnis repellendus sint est natus sed vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”