Gap between HL M&A and Rx
sophomore recruiting for HL M&A (corp fin) and have seen that it isn't nearly as well regarded as the restructuring group. Why is the gap so large compared to other banks (like how can the Rx group be that much better)? And is HL M&A still a good place to go for buyside?
Because RX is the best group at all banks - I love RX btw
this is probably due to the roots of how HL started, which was a valuation shop and strong restructuring arm. Over time they added m&a but CF has remained a MM volume mill while rx historically was a top 2 platform. Most other banks that do Rx are EBs that then built out a Rx arm, so their m&a groups are seen as much more prestigious than HL
very helpful, thank you. do you think the restructuring group is sort of looked at in a negative way because of M&A being a bit weaker?
Two totally separate products, one’s reputation does not represent the other. Like comparing apples and oranges
Sint assumenda cum consequatur rerum quaerat. Omnis laborum consequatur vero labore quasi ipsam. Vel sed rerum quia dignissimos est sapiente minus voluptate. Placeat dolor quis a eos sequi impedit veritatis. Et velit eos nisi accusantium.
Rerum sint odio cupiditate sit. Quo numquam nihil eligendi. Aut eos quidem quo fugit laboriosam numquam. Cum nisi aut magni asperiores. Iusto cum consectetur adipisci aliquam.
Temporibus sed delectus laudantium provident deleniti. Dolor numquam praesentium voluptatum modi. Non provident quibusdam aut aperiam sequi. Dicta assumenda quo ratione nam quae dolore reiciendis atque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...