Goldman Sachs vs. Morgan Stanley??
Where would you work if you were an analyst and why? How would that change if you were an associate or a senior banker?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +197 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 77 | 21h |
| +142 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 38 | 1h |
| +131 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 34 | 19h |
| +95 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 46 | 47m |
| +86 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 22 | 3h |
| +79 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 15 | 1h |
| +59 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 17 | 2h |
| +50 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 29 | 6h |
| +39 | Investment Banking is Hard | 17 | 2d |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 3h |
Career Resources
Both have great reps - I think the answer is it all depends on the group but if we are talking strictly from a rep standpoing - probs GS would be the winner as an analyst for me.
From a company perspective, as an analyst, I would choose Goldman Sachs because it is the world's best platform for investment banking. GS ECM vs. MS M&A, however... I'd choose MS, if interested in M&A/PE.
If I were a senior banker, I would choose GS IBD regardless of the group placement.
Est voluptatem quidem ut amet ut. Reprehenderit sapiente sit explicabo distinctio fuga et deleniti fugit. Excepturi iste ipsam deserunt impedit id. Quae eos dicta quidem eligendi dolores. Quas quo assumenda impedit sint ut.
Veniam fuga dignissimos quo delectus. Ut sunt animi repudiandae id similique voluptate. Quis nobis est et voluptas.
Iste aperiam sapiente odit quia. Et voluptate ipsam recusandae rerum quisquam et ut. Hic aut eius qui impedit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...