Houlihan Lokey Financial Valuation & Advisory (FVA) Team
Anyone have any details on the exit opportunities / reputation with other sell-side banks and buyside firms?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +219 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 42 | 6h |
| +167 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 3d |
| +111 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 15 | 10h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 1d |
| +52 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 5d |
| +44 | London IB BB is a challenge | 29 | 10h |
| +37 | momentum of Rx groups | 11 | 1d |
| +36 | Fired during interview | 6 | 14h |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 5d |
| +27 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 13 | 6h |
Career Resources
Generally decent exits to mm/bb. but also the specific group within fva can make a slight difference. I’m aware off Cvas and Pvfa being two that have a lot of people exit. Not sure about transaction opinions. Seen 2 from cvas/pvfa however who were able to lateral to ebs.
buyside can be limited but I know from ppl I’ve talked to that hl is pvfa does valuations for hedge funds/pe firms so it’s possible to leverage connections and exit.
Great, thanks! Mind if I PM you?
Sure!
transaction opinions and fund opinions are the ones with the most potential to exit, their work is a little more modeling centric and they also get paid more within fva compared to other groups. CVAS is much more of a quanty group than traditional ib and you do coding on the job.
Checks out, thanks. Do you see exits to IB M&A mainly, or any to DCM or credit research?
they dont do the most debt work outside of a few niches so doubt thats a main focus area for exits but im guessing they could if they wanted to.
the thing is those groups within HL are seen as a lifestyle alternative to traditional ib, most associates if not homegrown are laterals from ib and they prefer working less hours for a haircut on bonus. juniors (usually 1-2 yoe) who go to ib are usually bored w/ the work and probably didnt get a good ib offer so they used fva as a springpad to get back in. they wouldnt be interested in lateraling to dcm or credit research if just starting their career
Can speak to this - I would avoid this group unless you have no other options because you are doing a lot of boiler plate template DCFs where you are copying the sponsors projections, you are not doing sophisticated operating model builds. You get a decent understanding of the capital structure and how value breaks across different securities, especially in a distressed context (which is very useful); however, the modelling you are exposed to is sub par compared to a good M&A group or Financial Sponsors Group, but those teams are very doable exit options from FVA - you will very easily be able to lateral afterwards, especially at a place like HL FVA.
Thanks for this! Mind if I PM you?
Nostrum sit a quia consequatur sunt. Ut saepe deleniti quas placeat. At excepturi dolorem quasi iure recusandae. Voluptatem fugiat et magnam est tenetur. Ut culpa deleniti totam ea qui. Consequatur nihil doloremque rerum et occaecati.
Dolorem distinctio laudantium recusandae expedita debitis adipisci vel consequatur. Voluptatem et quas dolores deserunt. Dolore molestias distinctio qui minus iure ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...