12 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Typically as a % of TEV. Very large corporate deals cap out at certain “market” rates (call it, 1.5% of TEV of max) because many bulge brackets will compete for the mandate and their economics are well known by all parties involved. The more esoteric the situation, the more likely that the senior banker has pricing power via differentiated skill set, which can lead to larger fees for certain situations. I’d say these are more common in specialized industries like utilities + others I can’t speak to.

In the UMM, fees are generally higher as a % of TEV, and can even reach 3-7% depending on asset size. Specialized situations where the banker knows the market extremely well warrant higher fees, but sponsors don’t always pay for that. It is a risk-reward calc for the seller.


In all cases, but particularly UMM, good banks will also negotiate an aggressive ratchet whereby they capture a significant incremental fees (+3%, or even as crazy as +10%) for incremental TEV above certain negotiated thresholds.

In LMM, you start getting into business brokers. Don’t really know what their fees are, but I don’t think they do much traditional sellside M&A work - positioning, CIP, dataroom management, process leadership vs. just connecting seller and buyer and taking a finders fee.

 

Market Forces

Typically as a % of TEV. Very large corporate deals cap out at certain “market” rates (call it, 1.5% of TEV of max) because many bulge brackets will compete for the mandate and their economics are well known by all parties involved. The more esoteric the situation, the more likely that the senior banker has pricing power via differentiated skill set, which can lead to larger fees for certain situations. I’d say these are more common in specialized industries like utilities + others I can’t speak to.

In the UMM, fees are generally higher as a % of TEV, and can even reach 3-7% depending on asset size. Specialized situations where the banker knows the market extremely well warrant higher fees, but sponsors don’t always pay for that. It is a risk-reward calc for the seller.

In all cases, but particularly UMM, good banks will also negotiate an aggressive ratchet whereby they capture a significant incremental fees (+3%, or even as crazy as +10%) for incremental TEV above certain negotiated thresholds.

In LMM, you start getting into business brokers. Don’t really know what their fees are, but I don’t think they do much traditional sellside M&A work - positioning, CIP, dataroom management, process leadership vs. just connecting seller and buyer and taking a finders fee.

I work in LMM (95% sellside M&A with our deal EVs range from $25mm - $200mm), we typically structure our deals with a minimum fee and % of EV with kickers over a certain threshold (larger %). We do everything in a sell-side process any investment bank does (Buyers list, Teaser, CIM, Outreach, VDR management, Negotiating etc.)

 

Great adds, thank you. Definitely did not mean to imply all LMM is served by business brokerage, just that I don’t know how that space works. I suspect a business broker doing something in the $25-$100mm would charge a smaller % of TEV success fee but with none of the added bells and whistles from an investment bank that you mentioned.

 

Interesting.

So what are the typical deal fee % for transactions + kickers in the LMM to MM space from what you've experienced?

 

Dolores vel neque quis et optio occaecati porro. Ea dicta earum in quo. Aut necessitatibus ipsum vel. Et explicabo nulla dolor assumenda fugit. Vel odit odio accusamus nam ad earum. Aut explicabo earum tempora consequatur qui qui odit error.

Repudiandae ut ea ut accusamus aperiam sint. Sit alias corrupti quia. Doloremque amet deleniti quibusdam placeat libero reiciendis perferendis.

Nihil est delectus officiis qui suscipit nihil. Laudantium quas ut occaecati enim. Inventore culpa vel nihil non dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”