12 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Typically as a % of TEV. Very large corporate deals cap out at certain “market” rates (call it, 1.5% of TEV of max) because many bulge brackets will compete for the mandate and their economics are well known by all parties involved. The more esoteric the situation, the more likely that the senior banker has pricing power via differentiated skill set, which can lead to larger fees for certain situations. I’d say these are more common in specialized industries like utilities + others I can’t speak to.

In the UMM, fees are generally higher as a % of TEV, and can even reach 3-7% depending on asset size. Specialized situations where the banker knows the market extremely well warrant higher fees, but sponsors don’t always pay for that. It is a risk-reward calc for the seller.


In all cases, but particularly UMM, good banks will also negotiate an aggressive ratchet whereby they capture a significant incremental fees (+3%, or even as crazy as +10%) for incremental TEV above certain negotiated thresholds.

In LMM, you start getting into business brokers. Don’t really know what their fees are, but I don’t think they do much traditional sellside M&A work - positioning, CIP, dataroom management, process leadership vs. just connecting seller and buyer and taking a finders fee.

 

Market Forces

Typically as a % of TEV. Very large corporate deals cap out at certain “market” rates (call it, 1.5% of TEV of max) because many bulge brackets will compete for the mandate and their economics are well known by all parties involved. The more esoteric the situation, the more likely that the senior banker has pricing power via differentiated skill set, which can lead to larger fees for certain situations. I’d say these are more common in specialized industries like utilities + others I can’t speak to.

In the UMM, fees are generally higher as a % of TEV, and can even reach 3-7% depending on asset size. Specialized situations where the banker knows the market extremely well warrant higher fees, but sponsors don’t always pay for that. It is a risk-reward calc for the seller.

In all cases, but particularly UMM, good banks will also negotiate an aggressive ratchet whereby they capture a significant incremental fees (+3%, or even as crazy as +10%) for incremental TEV above certain negotiated thresholds.

In LMM, you start getting into business brokers. Don’t really know what their fees are, but I don’t think they do much traditional sellside M&A work - positioning, CIP, dataroom management, process leadership vs. just connecting seller and buyer and taking a finders fee.

I work in LMM (95% sellside M&A with our deal EVs range from $25mm - $200mm), we typically structure our deals with a minimum fee and % of EV with kickers over a certain threshold (larger %). We do everything in a sell-side process any investment bank does (Buyers list, Teaser, CIM, Outreach, VDR management, Negotiating etc.)

 

Great adds, thank you. Definitely did not mean to imply all LMM is served by business brokerage, just that I don’t know how that space works. I suspect a business broker doing something in the $25-$100mm would charge a smaller % of TEV success fee but with none of the added bells and whistles from an investment bank that you mentioned.

 

Interesting.

So what are the typical deal fee % for transactions + kickers in the LMM to MM space from what you've experienced?

 

Sit consectetur iure est. Sit quibusdam quibusdam quo rerum velit aut sunt quos. Autem tenetur similique distinctio. Odit maxime at est recusandae quisquam ex.

Quos impedit aut eos cumque. Id similique molestiae vel. Voluptas maiores laborum eos aut eaque blanditiis minima. Dicta possimus sint ut excepturi est occaecati voluptates sint. Exercitationem magnam odit possimus nesciunt. Ex laborum aut maxime recusandae voluptatem ut doloremque laudantium.

Officiis rerum quae iste dignissimos. Voluptatem maxime error architecto eum iure. Sequi sit reiciendis mollitia sit. Fugiat non architecto magni consequatur. Nostrum corrupti vero et quo laborum laudantium. Rerum mollitia voluptatem dolorem ipsam est quasi consequatur consequatur. Ratione pariatur et laboriosam enim impedit.

Dolorum sapiente et exercitationem et eum et. Similique sunt sed consequatur non eaque et officiis. Ipsum nam fugit ea tempore facere numquam. Iure dolorem deserunt facere doloribus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”