57 Comments
 
Most Helpful

My view. We are in the top of the first inning of the bloodbath and three years from the trough.

- IB headcount will be down 40-50% in the next three years through attrition and layoffs. Maybe more. The analyst bonuses at several firms are a kind way of telling people to GTFO

- Banks will protect their stars at every level. Just “above average” players will see their comp fall. Average and below are unlikely to survive and if they do, there is no reason to pay them well

- Analysts will have smaller classes; associates and VPs and Ds and average MDs are where the real pain will happen

- Amongst the large firms, American banks will continue to consolidate market share plus possibly Barclays and DB. But this will be on a much smaller market and there will be a lot of pain

- Middle market firms will continue to perform well although at many shops (JEF, HL), there is over staffing and I can see these firms being brutal in order to pay their producers

- Independent firms will diverge in their fortunes, some illustrious names will be decimated, some will muddle through. Overall, it will be tough. I would still prefer to be at these or the MM firms in a downturn because they tend to be less political and advisory work is less cyclical

- Those that survive will do very well in the next cycle; it’s often a blessing to start in a downturn if you can make it through

- Whatever hits banking will hit law and consulting equally hard, and tech much much  harder. Amongst high paying professions there will be little room to run

in summary, I see a bad moon rising

 
Funniest
mergersandacquisitions78

My view. We are in the top of the first inning of the bloodbath and three years from the trough.

- IB headcount will be down 40-50% in the next three years through attrition and layoffs. Maybe more. The analyst bonuses at several firms are a kind way of telling people to GTFO

- Banks will protect their stars at every level. Just "above average" players will see their comp fall. Average and below are unlikely to survive and if they do, there is no reason to pay them well

- Analysts will have smaller classes; associates and VPs and Ds and average MDs are where the real pain will happen

- Amongst the large firms, American banks will continue to consolidate market share plus possibly Barclays and DB. But this will be on a much smaller market and there will be a lot of pain

- Middle market firms will continue to perform well although at many shops (JEF, HL), there is over staffing and I can see these firms being brutal in order to pay their producers

- Independent firms will diverge in their fortunes, some illustrious names will be decimated, some will muddle through. Overall, it will be tough. I would still prefer to be at these or the MM firms in a downturn because they tend to be less political and advisory work is less cyclical

- Those that survive will do very well in the next cycle; it's often a blessing to start in a downturn if you can make it through

- Whatever hits banking will hit law and consulting equally hard, and tech much much  harder. Amongst high paying professions there will be little room to run

in summary, I see a bad moon rising

Soruce: Trust me bro

 

Appreciate your honest take and trust you've seen things a long time so know better than most but feel like this is way to precise of a prediction

On what basis do you think things will recover in 3 years? 40-50% also seems really punitive, that's like half the headcount at major banks, you really think they'll fire that many people in this cycle? Even in 2008 some of the major banks didn't cut that much

I’m a banker - it’s my job to be precise when dealing with uncertainty (what we do when we recommend a specific purchase price to a client or price a bond).

2008 is the wrong comparison. Banking fees actually didn’t drop and capital markets were close for no longer than a month. Rescue financings and balance sheet repair made 2009 a good year, and you saw banks like Barclays and Jefferies bid aggressively for bankers. I don’t think headcount fell.

2001 to 2004 and 1990 to 1993 feel much more comparable in terms of how long markets are shut. The three years is a guess based on the comps. It generally takes a year of shellshock (which is now), a year of bloodletting and a year of recovery. In each of those markets, banking headcount fell 40-50% and the overhiring was greater this time.

and why I feel this persists.

Equity and HY capital markets have been shut for the better part of six months. This didn’t happen in 2008 and is worse than 2001.

Bulge bracket banking revenues are down 50%+. Comparable to 2001. M&A will do ok but it can’t conpensate for loss of ECM and HY.

Large balance sheet losses for hung LBOs. Goldman losing money is a canary in a coal mine.

and an increasing acknowledgment relative to the past that at most banks 20% of the people bring in 80% of the money which means a lot more understanding that you need to pay your stars and everyone else is expendable 

 

Cant comment on current state of affairs in banks since I am no longer a banker but I started my analyst program in 2008 at a bulge bracket so can give some color on what happened in 2008 and don't think this is comparable in terms of magnitude

I was a summer in 2007 which was a record year for analyst bonus (top tier first year analyst at $70K with $60K base, thank god for inflation) but even towards end of my summer the doom was coming and most bankers were already cautious and telling incoming analyst they were unlikely to get anything like that.

Anyways when I started in summer 2008 you started living the recession with very limited live deal flow and obviously all the news including Lehman's BK. There was a first round of layoffs in September '08 and it was mostly bad performers at Associate and VP level. There was a second round in December '08 and this one impacted 3rd year analyst, associates, and VPs and it included top performers and probably 10 to 15% of most groups. This second round included 1st year analyst in DCM and ECM but not IBD.

There was a third round in March '09 of mostly 1st year analyst and associates. 

But by October '09 most groups were looking to hire. My group let go 4 analyst, 2 associates and end up hiring 2 analyst in October '09. Also there was a decent salary bump in summer '09 ($60k to $70K)

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”