Most Helpful

My view. We are in the top of the first inning of the bloodbath and three years from the trough.

- IB headcount will be down 40-50% in the next three years through attrition and layoffs. Maybe more. The analyst bonuses at several firms are a kind way of telling people to GTFO

- Banks will protect their stars at every level. Just “above average” players will see their comp fall. Average and below are unlikely to survive and if they do, there is no reason to pay them well

- Analysts will have smaller classes; associates and VPs and Ds and average MDs are where the real pain will happen

- Amongst the large firms, American banks will continue to consolidate market share plus possibly Barclays and DB. But this will be on a much smaller market and there will be a lot of pain

- Middle market firms will continue to perform well although at many shops (JEF, HL), there is over staffing and I can see these firms being brutal in order to pay their producers

- Independent firms will diverge in their fortunes, some illustrious names will be decimated, some will muddle through. Overall, it will be tough. I would still prefer to be at these or the MM firms in a downturn because they tend to be less political and advisory work is less cyclical

- Those that survive will do very well in the next cycle; it’s often a blessing to start in a downturn if you can make it through

- Whatever hits banking will hit law and consulting equally hard, and tech much much  harder. Amongst high paying professions there will be little room to run

in summary, I see a bad moon rising

 
Funniest
mergersandacquisitions78

My view. We are in the top of the first inning of the bloodbath and three years from the trough.

- IB headcount will be down 40-50% in the next three years through attrition and layoffs. Maybe more. The analyst bonuses at several firms are a kind way of telling people to GTFO

- Banks will protect their stars at every level. Just "above average" players will see their comp fall. Average and below are unlikely to survive and if they do, there is no reason to pay them well

- Analysts will have smaller classes; associates and VPs and Ds and average MDs are where the real pain will happen

- Amongst the large firms, American banks will continue to consolidate market share plus possibly Barclays and DB. But this will be on a much smaller market and there will be a lot of pain

- Middle market firms will continue to perform well although at many shops (JEF, HL), there is over staffing and I can see these firms being brutal in order to pay their producers

- Independent firms will diverge in their fortunes, some illustrious names will be decimated, some will muddle through. Overall, it will be tough. I would still prefer to be at these or the MM firms in a downturn because they tend to be less political and advisory work is less cyclical

- Those that survive will do very well in the next cycle; it's often a blessing to start in a downturn if you can make it through

- Whatever hits banking will hit law and consulting equally hard, and tech much much  harder. Amongst high paying professions there will be little room to run

in summary, I see a bad moon rising

Soruce: Trust me bro

 

Appreciate your honest take and trust you’ve seen things a long time so know better than most but feel like this is way to precise of a prediction

On what basis do you think things will recover in 3 years? 40-50% also seems really punitive, that’s like half the headcount at major banks, you really think they’ll fire that many people in this cycle? Even in 2008 some of the major banks didn’t cut that much

 

Appreciate your honest take and trust you've seen things a long time so know better than most but feel like this is way to precise of a prediction

On what basis do you think things will recover in 3 years? 40-50% also seems really punitive, that's like half the headcount at major banks, you really think they'll fire that many people in this cycle? Even in 2008 some of the major banks didn't cut that much

I’m a banker - it’s my job to be precise when dealing with uncertainty (what we do when we recommend a specific purchase price to a client or price a bond).

2008 is the wrong comparison. Banking fees actually didn’t drop and capital markets were close for no longer than a month. Rescue financings and balance sheet repair made 2009 a good year, and you saw banks like Barclays and Jefferies bid aggressively for bankers. I don’t think headcount fell.

2001 to 2004 and 1990 to 1993 feel much more comparable in terms of how long markets are shut. The three years is a guess based on the comps. It generally takes a year of shellshock (which is now), a year of bloodletting and a year of recovery. In each of those markets, banking headcount fell 40-50% and the overhiring was greater this time.

and why I feel this persists.

Equity and HY capital markets have been shut for the better part of six months. This didn’t happen in 2008 and is worse than 2001.

Bulge bracket banking revenues are down 50%+. Comparable to 2001. M&A will do ok but it can’t conpensate for loss of ECM and HY.

Large balance sheet losses for hung LBOs. Goldman losing money is a canary in a coal mine.

and an increasing acknowledgment relative to the past that at most banks 20% of the people bring in 80% of the money which means a lot more understanding that you need to pay your stars and everyone else is expendable 

 

mergersandacquisitions78

My view. We are in the top of the first inning of the bloodbath and three years from the trough.

- IB headcount will be down 40-50% in the next three years through attrition and layoffs. Maybe more. The analyst bonuses at several firms are a kind way of telling people to GTFO

- Banks will protect their stars at every level. Just "above average" players will see their comp fall. Average and below are unlikely to survive and if they do, there is no reason to pay them well

- Analysts will have smaller classes; associates and VPs and Ds and average MDs are where the real pain will happen

- Amongst the large firms, American banks will continue to consolidate market share plus possibly Barclays and DB. But this will be on a much smaller market and there will be a lot of pain

- Middle market firms will continue to perform well although at many shops (JEF, HL), there is over staffing and I can see these firms being brutal in order to pay their producers

- Independent firms will diverge in their fortunes, some illustrious names will be decimated, some will muddle through. Overall, it will be tough. I would still prefer to be at these or the MM firms in a downturn because they tend to be less political and advisory work is less cyclical

- Those that survive will do very well in the next cycle; it's often a blessing to start in a downturn if you can make it through

- Whatever hits banking will hit law and consulting equally hard, and tech much much  harder. Amongst high paying professions there will be little room to run

in summary, I see a bad moon rising

Keep in mind that this is just one person's take. This guy just said that "Whatever hits banking will hit law and consulting equally hard, and tech much much harder." Banking always tends to get hit the hardest since the direct first order effect of rising interest rates is to siphon money out of the capital markets, thus reducing transaction activity. Sure, all high paying professions suffer, but others are hit more indirectly as a second or third order effect of rates. And then there are fields like consulting where this guy is just completely off; my buddies at MBB tell me that it's business as usual and in fact some are busier than ever because companies want advice on what to do when things are getting tight. I'm not gonna take out the time to refute the other stuff he says but it's mostly just one guy's opinion, none of it is really substantiated by hard evidence.

 

So much fear mongering going on. Sure bonuses and M&A volume won’t be at peak Covid level but this isn’t going to be an ‘08. I think we as a generation just aren’t used to recessions when they’re a pretty normal aspect of the economical cycle.

 

Cant comment on current state of affairs in banks since I am no longer a banker but I started my analyst program in 2008 at a bulge bracket so can give some color on what happened in 2008 and don't think this is comparable in terms of magnitude

I was a summer in 2007 which was a record year for analyst bonus (top tier first year analyst at $70K with $60K base, thank god for inflation) but even towards end of my summer the doom was coming and most bankers were already cautious and telling incoming analyst they were unlikely to get anything like that.

Anyways when I started in summer 2008 you started living the recession with very limited live deal flow and obviously all the news including Lehman's BK. There was a first round of layoffs in September '08 and it was mostly bad performers at Associate and VP level. There was a second round in December '08 and this one impacted 3rd year analyst, associates, and VPs and it included top performers and probably 10 to 15% of most groups. This second round included 1st year analyst in DCM and ECM but not IBD.

There was a third round in March '09 of mostly 1st year analyst and associates. 

But by October '09 most groups were looking to hire. My group let go 4 analyst, 2 associates and end up hiring 2 analyst in October '09. Also there was a decent salary bump in summer '09 ($60k to $70K)

 

No chance this is '08 - there was a systemic crisis predicated by the housing market that caused a chain reaction.  This is just a case of over-exuberance and over-valuation.  The one wild card is rarely have we seen rates rise as an economy slows but I imagine that will be a self-fulfilling prophecy and we'll go back to cutting sooner rather than later.

 

The last time we had stagflation, it was followed by a huge LBO boom and the golden age of high finance. Not saying the same will happen again as the industry today is clearly at a very different stage of growth. But any claims that headcount will drop 50%+ are equally exaggerated.

 

You should'nt, most likely impact for you would be a low bonus and

  1. Unlikely if not close to impossible to be as bad as '08/'09
  2. Analyst are always the last to go
  3. Companies give good severance packages (in '08/'09 they gave three moths salaries and 6 month COBRA coverage)
  4. Anecdotally none of the analyst or associate I knew who got cut had their career negatively impacted long-term and actually will say the most successful person i knew from my analyst class was one of the guys that got let go 
 
Devils Advocate

I have a feeling that anyone thinking we are going to go through a 2008/2009 experience was not in banking in 2008/2009.

I was and it was scary as fuck. This doesn't even remotely compare 

Recent bias. Most analysts were being birthed during dot com bust. 
 

this is a tech bust with real estate bubble popping. Both are huge components of the S&P and will hurt everyone bc of passive management 

 

Based on how my experience during the last recession it's going to be a rough day better buckle down and prepare for the worst. Might be time to move to smaller shops to weather the storm. I heard City Capital Advisors out in Chicago has been booming recently sign of the times.

 

How would moving to smaller shops help weather the storm? Smaller shops are the first to fall. Also, idk what “City Capital Advisors” is, but what city do they be advising?

 

Companies packed on debt to get through covid and now the consumer has far less to spend due to inflation. This will kill growth for a decade or more. Stagflation is more like it.

Capital markets activity will be all but dead, and M&A will be subdued. It's not really complicated. The last 30 years have seen the complete financialization of the global economy and now that will all unwind. 

Comparisons to 2008 are stupid, these are two entirely different paradigms. 08 was a liquidity problem, this is a solvency problem. 

 

Itaque occaecati voluptas eos. Natus odit odio quos sapiente id. Cupiditate autem ut rem fuga molestias ducimus quis.

Perspiciatis consectetur explicabo eaque eveniet. Enim fugiat laborum similique consequatur ut qui voluptatum. Omnis quasi soluta iste. Tempore consectetur nisi dolores velit.

Pariatur consequuntur ut autem ut laudantium. Consequatur reiciendis earum architecto aliquam. Ipsam doloremque quibusdam neque quo qui.

Dolorem veritatis error repellendus non. Eum omnis omnis assumenda ullam.

 

Voluptatum ipsum error aliquid illum. Sint ut molestiae omnis minus cumque incidunt. Quasi sed et maxime. Reprehenderit reprehenderit ut repellat qui provident omnis modi. Delectus voluptas alias molestiae.

Rerum voluptatem quidem consequuntur sequi enim. Hic dolorem aut quia laborum vel. Atque modi ut sit vitae.

Architecto animi est officia consequatur et eum. Molestias et omnis et dolor cum. Sunt quo eum sint et et.

Rerum dolor debitis voluptatum ut placeat. Hic consequuntur tempore atque quas soluta assumenda in inventore. Et consectetur et maxime quia omnis et id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”