Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +233 | Only Indians cold emailing | 64 | 13m |
| +231 | UBS Healthcare | 47 | 5h |
| +60 | UBS MDs Treat Employees like Dogshit, Data to Prove it | 9 | 4h |
| +58 | More diversity needed in the industry | 11 | 2d |
| +57 | Shana tova - happy new year | 9 | 1d |
| +48 | NYC Wall Street Run Club | 13 | 1d |
| +21 | Feeling a bad pattern forming. I need some help | 3 | 3d |
| +21 | What is the role of an analyst at your firm? | 1 | 2d |
| +19 | Reaching out to interviewer who rejected me | 2 | 2d |
| +17 | "Don't include firm in Cover Letter's file name" | 5 | 15h |
Career Resources
Velocity of money*(1-win rate), discounted appropriately. Hard part is figuring out how many quarters are going into the thing but presumably it would have that data.
Would you argue that velocity versus total inflow of currency would make a large difference?
Also any thoughts on approaching it comparatively?
I mean I guess both of those get you to the same place (that is, velocity is just a rate of the total inflow).
Comparatively to... what?
Is it independent of the market? Sure your winrate is uncorrelated, but are the flow of funds correlated with the market at all? Do you think people gamble more or less during a recession? I honestly don't know, but the statement that it's independent of the market is certainly not obvious to me
I agree that cash flows may fluctuate depending on economic state, but I think it's logical to say it's independent of the market when you think of something like it's beta for if you were calculating a WACC
If the cash flows (asset returns) are correlated with the market, that's by definition a non-zero beta.
Edit: my point is just that you would need to show that people's gambling behavior was completely independent of their wealth. I'd suspect that Vegas sees more business when the economy's doing well. If that's the case, and our slot machine has a higher utilization, then the slot machine is not independent and has a positive beta
interesting. thank you for the clarification.
Blanditiis nam beatae amet voluptas repellendus tempora. Adipisci inventore distinctio et voluptatem. Numquam ut dolores magnam voluptas harum vel.
Minima voluptatibus saepe quo necessitatibus. Repellat exercitationem dolorem voluptas omnis placeat voluptatem. Qui dolorum sit sint eos repellendus dolores nam. Quis officia fugit et vitae quasi.
Quia deleniti et sed ipsam aut. Sit officia asperiores iusto qui tempora totam dolorum est. Facere eum alias corrupti molestiae. Quidem rem totam error illo dolorem. Tempore minima voluptate qui incidunt quia. Commodi dolorem voluptatem deleniti beatae officia distinctio inventore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Qui adipisci et quis est reprehenderit provident. Rerum dolore nobis sed quas molestiae optio eveniet. Facere aut sit est ipsam omnis libero neque.
Non vel temporibus perferendis non consequatur molestiae. Consequatur eius voluptatibus accusantium delectus tempore. Assumenda eligendi voluptatibus quod et. Officiis sit qui voluptas id enim ex eum hic. Repellat qui est nesciunt eveniet ex ea. Voluptas asperiores repudiandae aut libero. Est cumque aliquam rerum rerum sed voluptatem dolor.