How important is the Suited test?

Not gonna lie I feel like I bombed the “essential competencies” part. I wasn’t anywhere near finishing any of the sections. And I noticed that several of my top choice banks use them which is worrying because now I feel like I just fucked over my chances at all of them, because apparently once you take it that score gets sent to EVERY FIRM you apply to.

To anyone currently in the SA recruiting process, how close were y’all to finishing any of the sections? Pretty sure I didn’t even make it halfway thru most of them lmao. Anyone else feel like they bombed and still get a first round?

To people at firms that use Suited, how important is the test? Is it just an HR screen thing to make sure I’m not a complete retard or do you actually use it to decide on candidates?

Just feeling kinda duped and don’t know what to do, anything helps

16 Comments
 

Think you missed the point of the test mate. It's meant to measure your traits and aptitudes, not to judge if you're an idiot. You can't really "fail" it similar to Pymetrics. Banks will use it to see if you're a good fit for a certain position.

In the UK we do psychometric tests all the time and there are many where they don't expect you to "finish".

 

I think the assessments matter a lot. I tried recruiting last cycle (obviously wasn't successful lol) after my freshman year at a non-target. I had no finance experience whatsoever. For my Morgan Stanley app, I had to do some bs tests. I knew I killed them though, and I ended up getting a first round there. The characters first test where you had like a minute to evaluate same or different I probably only got 15-20 done. The second character matching multiple correct portion I got somewhere around 25/30 done. The logical statement ones I ended up finishing it all because I know the rules pretty well. Math one I probably got 20 ish done. Looked like there were 30 total. The math one had some wack ass patterns though not gonna lie. It's a pretty hard test, so don't feel bad.

If I'm being honest, I'm pretty sure the firms that partner with Suited use it to ding most of the apps they get (assuming they don't meet a high percentile/score cutoff). Banks want to avoid having to sift through the large amount of apps they get, so using these assessments to eliminate as many students as possible saves them time.

I disagree with the poster above because it's not like the only thing was a personality test. Yes there was a 100 question psychometric test, but I don't think they really put that much focus on that unless you have really bad answers. They definitely use "essential competencies" test to cut out people in my opinion.

And yeah I agree it sucks that they use your first attempt at all banks you apply to that use Suited. Best of luck dude. Don't dwell on this too much

 

OP here, forgot abt this thread. Good news is I ended up at a large MM that doesn't use Suited, then recruited FT and will start at a BB after i graduate this summer. So if you bomb it's not the end of the world. Bad news is I did not get interviews for SA at any of the places that did use it - but interestingly I interviewed at a few of these firms for FT (over a year later). I think your scores expire after a year or two. Seems like some firms care about it more than others, but still a bit of a mystery tbh

 

This just came up for me in one of the jobs I'm applying for. Anyone able to share what to expect on the Essential Competencies part? Want to make sure I'm ready to take it especially if it's going to dictate my job prospects!

 

I just took it an hour ago. I think it was 4 sections. All are short time, maybe 20 questions, and wrong answers do hurt you, so don't guess. They basically look like this, best I can remember:

Sec 1: Checkbox Same or Different

jl;4$fdsa  :  jl;4$fdsa           X Same    _ Different

kjl3@a^  :  kJl3@a^           _ Same    X Different

Sec 2: Checkbox the strings that match

aeFD#v^lp

__ aeFD#v^Lp

__ aeFD#V^lp

 aeFD#v^lp

__ aeDF#v^lp

Sec 3: Logic problems - True, False, or Uncertain

(I struggled with this more than I should have because of the "All" vs. "Some". For instance in this example, I know that ALL soccer players are fast runners. Set of sets says that any SOME set is included in the ALL set. So TRUE, some soccer players are fast runner because all soccer players are fast runners. But I'm not sure that was what they were looking for.)

All soccer players are fast runners. All fast runners are not high jumpers.

T/F/U: Some high jumpers are soccer players.

T/F/U: Some high jumpers are fast runners.

T/F/U: Some Soccer players are fast runners.

T/F/U: Some fast runners are soccer players.

Sec 4: Fill in the pattern

-2, 1.5, 5, 8.5, 12, 15.5, 19, 22.5, ___

^ This was the easiest one. Some were WACK like this:

2, 8, 16, 3, 9, 27, __, 12, 72

Ans: 6

It's sets of 3 where b = a+6 and c = b*a

 

Vel eum eveniet fuga natus est dolorem. Consectetur ea quisquam et cum. Ipsa accusamus voluptatum qui suscipit eum deserunt. Voluptatem placeat modi soluta. Id vitae rerum corporis distinctio et incidunt et.

Praesentium repellendus repudiandae nulla. Vero aut occaecati nam excepturi sed consequatur. Non cumque dolor sit dolores rerum asperiores.

Quaerat optio dolores non alias nesciunt nemo est. Amet aliquam dolor ratione sit qui aliquam non. Quos repudiandae quas est amet. Sint quia sint quia sunt id exercitationem repellat. Ut odit quis consequatur sunt atque velit. Quasi veritatis tempora qui. Nemo dolorum illo aperiam non dolore rem illo.

Corrupti quasi qui libero libero rerum debitis ut. Repellendus unde doloremque quis et. Molestias exercitationem perferendis voluptatem dicta praesentium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”