18 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Don't stress about it a ton. Most of the time, senior analysts and associates will handle the modeling so as to not bottleneck workflows (nothing against new analysts; we're all just trying to get to bed as soon as we can). As you gain tenure and prove you can do other tasks well and with little hand-holding (doing tasks as asked, catching your own mistakes before associates+ see materials, demonstrating you're organized, other ad hoc analyses in Excel), you'll be given more model responsibility. No one wants to throw you in the deep end on a giant model on day one both for your sake and their sake.

 

As others have said, I don't think it's immediate.

However, you should spend a little time learning how to do it. Worst case, you've wasted some time, best case you add a little bit of value to the team and get to bed earlier (rather than fucking around in excel, getting two other people involved and turning it into a shitshow).

At least get the basics down, it's helpful.

You'll obviously pick more up, or your group won't do a ton. But it helps alleviate anxiety to know it.

Some of your exit opportunities might require a model test, so worth learning early and keeping fresh. 

 

It really depends. Most of the time you’ll do the historical spreads as the first year for the first 6months or so (some people might call this modeling, but I would disagree). Usually the second year then comes in and builds the projection model etc. I try to keep my first years involved, so they get learning experience and know that’s going on. After that I let them make changes / tweak the model if we get some feedback. That way, they learn how the model functions etc. usually after 6 months they are ready to build their own model with little hand holding.

I think it just depends how you define “modeling”. Sure you could call copying in a DCF tab from an old model and re-linking the cells “modeling”. But to me modeling is building the whole mechanics, case drivers, assumptions and any other company specific nuances what’s considered modeling.

 

Suscipit quia et aut harum sed recusandae. Perferendis perferendis consequatur vel doloribus tenetur quo. Quos eius ratione maiores in voluptatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”