How to build three statement model efficiently with many line items?

Three statement model for a case study (public company). I wonder what’s the best way to approach the three statement model given it has smaller line items like deferred income taxes…etc. Shall I combine line items like PPE with goodiwll and intangible asset? Been trying to balance the BS but it keeps falling apart. 

2 Comments
 

When building a three-statement model for a public company case study, especially with numerous line items, efficiency and accuracy are key. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s how you can approach it:

1. Start with a Clear Structure

  • Income Statement: Begin with revenue, cost of goods sold (COGS), and operating expenses. Work your way down to net income.
  • Balance Sheet: Organize assets (current and non-current), liabilities (current and long-term), and equity.
  • Cash Flow Statement: Link it to the income statement and balance sheet, breaking it into operating, investing, and financing activities.

2. Group Line Items Thoughtfully

  • Combining line items like PPE, goodwill, and intangible assets is generally not recommended unless explicitly instructed. These items often have different accounting treatments and implications for forecasting.
  • For smaller line items like deferred income taxes, include them separately if they are material or if the case study requires detailed analysis. Otherwise, you can group immaterial items into "Other Assets" or "Other Liabilities."

3. Link the Statements

  • Ensure all three statements are interconnected:
    • Net Income flows from the income statement to the cash flow statement and retained earnings on the balance sheet.
    • Depreciation/Amortization is added back in the cash flow statement and reduces PPE on the balance sheet.
    • Changes in Working Capital affect both the cash flow statement and balance sheet.
  • Use formulas to maintain consistency and avoid manual errors.

4. Focus on Balancing the Balance Sheet

  • If the balance sheet doesn’t balance, check:
    • Retained earnings: Ensure it reflects net income and dividends correctly.
    • Cash flow adjustments: Verify that all non-cash items and changes in working capital are accurately captured.
    • Circular references: Use Excel tools like iterative calculations to resolve them.

5. Simplify Where Possible

  • For case studies, focus on the most critical drivers and assumptions. Avoid overcomplicating the model with excessive detail unless required.
  • Use placeholders or assumptions for less critical items to save time.

6. Test and Debug

  • Audit your formulas and ensure all links between the statements are functioning correctly.
  • Use error-checking tools in Excel to identify inconsistencies.

7. Resources for Practice

  • WSO offers financial modeling templates and lessons, including detailed guides on building three-statement models. These can help you refine your approach and troubleshoot common issues.

By following these steps, you can efficiently build a robust three-statement model while maintaining accuracy and clarity. If balancing issues persist, revisit your linking logic and assumptions to identify discrepancies.

Sources: How would you approach a 4 hour case study?, Citadel (Surveyor) Case Study/Modeling Test, DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf, Structuring and Flow in an M&A Model, PE / Buyside Modelling

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Animi eos et libero incidunt repellendus enim itaque. Iusto exercitationem excepturi necessitatibus quisquam. Repellendus repellendus deleniti nam rem exercitationem et qui quo.

Optio inventore et est rerum aspernatur nam. Aliquid quia voluptatem corporis aperiam quis debitis rem iure. Consequatur adipisci sed sequi eum. Eligendi incidunt iusto ut aliquid earum occaecati. Officiis ipsam non iusto.

Corporis nostrum tempore inventore eos possimus est. Ducimus molestiae architecto fugit officiis. Aut voluptates aspernatur rerum ut.

Velit tenetur eius aut fugiat odio molestiae. Est pariatur et et porro. Et modi dolor minima sunt est aut dicta. Et amet esse facilis expedita.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”