If two companies have the same financial statement why would they have different multiples? Investment Banking interview question
| +192 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 50 | 3h |
| +96 | IB Energy Drink Tier List / Ranking | 67 | 12m |
| +82 | PJT M&A Group Selection 2026 | 13 | 1d |
| +70 | ONLY THESE BANKS OR YOU STRUCK OUT | 27 | 3h |
| +34 | Feedback for internship first desk at IBD BB - personal fit, "don't be too confident" | 23 | 1d |
| +28 | Does BofA still pay its associates rat pellets? | 14 | 18h |
| +21 | Stay at Weak Dealflow Team or Lateral? | 3 | 6h |
| +21 | Firm Thinks I'm Lying About Offer | 5 | 46m |
| +19 | Updated JPM Group Rankings | 30 | 19h |
| +19 | VP Deal Origination Credit | 2 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
(1) Different industry. Let's say you have 2 companies, one is telecom and the other is utilities. Both of these are rather capital intensive businesses with frequent reinvestment needs, but because of the AI trade over the last couple years, utilities companies have been trading at way way higher multiples. (2) Future prospects. While it is instructive, nobody values a business on how they have performed in the past; we are paying for the future cash flows they generate. Thus, while last year we may have had the same revenue, margins, etc., one business may be expected to deteriorate on those fronts in the coming years. For example, say you have a small mining company with one mine that is currently producing a lot of resources, but is not expected to do so as much in the future. The market would ascribe a lower multiple to this mining company, as opposed to a niche SaaS business that is unlikely to be replaced.
Can you provide a more specific example with numbers to illustrate how future prospects affect multiples? For instance, if two companies have the same current financials, but one has expected growth and the other is expected to decline, how would the multiples differ based on that?
It's an art, not a science. One company is expected to grow at 10% per year, the other is expected to grow at 5%. The future growth rate is not reflected in historical financials. Investors will pay a higher multiple on current EBITDA if they believe cash flows will grow faster.
Eos et odio cum ut fugiat officiis reiciendis. Doloremque eos sint unde reprehenderit id impedit. Voluptas qui dolorum aut. Earum ab voluptatum cumque ipsum.
Officia corporis tenetur aut aspernatur. Ut tempore quam quae dicta. Harum omnis dolorem molestiae dolore tenetur eum. Et maxime et laboriosam voluptatibus necessitatibus veritatis error. Iure est quidem sapiente illo quos doloremque quos.
Error sapiente omnis totam occaecati. Iste asperiores in est tempora voluptatem non. Laboriosam quis laborum tenetur id rerum amet porro.
Voluptate quia sequi ea unde quibusdam dolores. Excepturi facere enim officia qui ex quas dolores. Dicta et ut facilis numquam in quas optio at. Voluptatibus ipsa accusantium est dolores possimus itaque sequi in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...