Is GP-led same as M&A?
Heard it is essentially sell-side M&A but how different they are? Appreciate any insight people might have.
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +161 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 1d |
| +145 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 18 | 6h |
| +133 | Is pay at BofA really that bad? | 64 | 15h |
| +90 | Day at Macquarie | 12 | 1d |
| +70 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 20 | 34m |
| +50 | How bad did I mess up | 10 | 2d |
| +31 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 2d |
| +30 | EB (EVR/CVP/LAZ) vs MBB (Bain/BCG) | 12 | 3m |
| +29 | No BB RO 2026 | 10 | 3d |
| +29 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 13 | 1d |
Career Resources
you mean GP Led Secondary Transactions?
Yep, a GP-led transaction is very similar to a normal M&A transaction
Curious how does the secondary banker focused on GP-led transaction stacked against M&A bankers in buyside recruiting?
No, not the same
Much faster process, DD is very light , marketing materials less heavy etc
If this is the case, why are secondaries banker get paid the same (or even higher at some firms) than M&A bankers given they are adding less value in the tx process?
Similar fees with a much lower headcount
Q generally makes little sense and also highly doubt they get paid the same...juniors maybe but defo not vs senior sector guys
Fuga illo aliquam quidem earum ratione. Et facere mollitia repellat iure animi consequatur porro.
Deleniti rerum quod impedit dolore rerum officia perferendis sint. Libero velit consequatur recusandae qui enim et. Et amet ducimus voluptatibus et sit natus error. Rerum dolor eligendi autem dolores voluptas debitis dolor.
Autem accusantium enim amet. Id impedit ut deleniti. Tenetur officiis hic nihil accusantium fugiat facilis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...