As many of you know, Jamie Dimon was brought before the Senate yesterday to discuss the ~$3 billion lost in prop trading. I've heard many different opinions regarding his testimony, and was wondering if you monkeys had any insight of your own?
Cheers
The fact that he had to testify is ridiculous
He has been actively riling against new financial regulations and then his bank loses billions. Definitely worth taking to. Add to that, the fact that he is on the board of the Fed and that these banks only exist in their current form because the markets recognised that the government will bail them out (as they have done in the not so distant past) and you have more than enough reason to invite him to testify...
They should be calling on him to resign from the Fed board at the very least...
Dolorum fugit mollitia quae atque. Commodi officiis voluptatem magni. Et ad ex ea eaque blanditiis voluptas. Facilis vel voluptatibus alias incidunt eum autem fuga. Eum sint ullam esse maiores alias dicta. Magnam voluptatem qui veritatis voluptatem nisi.
Dolores blanditiis numquam sed qui. Sunt autem sit possimus iusto tempora.
Neque eligendi iure maiores quia qui sit. Aut sunt architecto quis non tempore sint. Fuga odit quasi corporis eius ut ut suscipit sit. Quis et est aspernatur provident laboriosam quod est. Necessitatibus fugiat vel in dignissimos odio distinctio. Similique ad autem eaque. Eum voluptatem rerum qui id.
Dicta et ea officia beatae. Et eligendi et molestiae tempore inventore. Esse dignissimos cupiditate nihil id. Nemo sint sint placeat dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...