Litquidity Comp Survey
Has anyone noticed that litquiditys comp survey is consistently wrong?
Noticed three banks in particular CS, DB and Moelis that are extremely inconsistent (and reported much lower than) from what I’ve heard first hand.
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +198 | Who Killed Wall Street | 65 | 10h |
| +177 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 35 | 4h |
| +164 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 4d |
| +120 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 22 | 1d |
| +58 | How bad did I mess up | 11 | 22h |
| +43 | EB (EVR/CVP/LAZ) vs MBB (Bain/BCG) | 21 | 19h |
| +34 | Most technical groups? | 18 | 1d |
| +32 | NYC Wall Street Run Club | 4 | 10h |
| +29 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 13 | 4d |
| +21 | Meritocratic IB groups / banks | 15 | 2d |
Career Resources
Results are likely skewed from EMEA respondents. It’s inaccurate to include non American numbers in aggregate with American numbers since it’s not comparable at all.
MS numbers super wrong as well but MS is smaller so the data set is probably less complete than say BAML or whatever the ones with the most analysts are
Animi aut eveniet ullam commodi vel. Ratione hic sit et ut quasi.
Sit nihil aut asperiores quidem accusamus est suscipit. Omnis quia repellat facere earum. Ad molestiae omnis maiores dignissimos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...