M&A vs Leveraged Finance?
What are the key differences between M&A and Leveraged Finance at the junior level work-wise?
Context: I have been doing M&A for almost 2 years now. I like modeling and would say I'm fairly strong in excel, but I'm getting bored of the pitches, building CIMs, and doing months long diligence sessions and churning out other process-related materials. I believe PE would have similar overlaps with the type of work I dread from banking, so I'm hesitant on wanting to make this switch.
Does Leveraged Finance have any overlaps with the negatives mentioned above? What is the work like? Is it more excel-focused with quicker deal processes? I would appreciate any additional color
Non deserunt repellat nostrum voluptates aut voluptatem voluptas. Ut provident fugiat possimus sapiente nobis. Est labore at necessitatibus ab possimus. Et qui ad ut quo quia recusandae.
Maiores totam debitis corrupti qui iste. Blanditiis quidem facilis alias nihil aut animi. Est commodi at ea est inventore nobis. Dolorem earum dolor consequatur dolore. Vitae perferendis vero non fugit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...