M&A vs Leveraged Finance?
What are the key differences between M&A and Leveraged Finance at the junior level work-wise?
Context: I have been doing M&A for almost 2 years now. I like modeling and would say I'm fairly strong in excel, but I'm getting bored of the pitches, building CIMs, and doing months long diligence sessions and churning out other process-related materials. I believe PE would have similar overlaps with the type of work I dread from banking, so I'm hesitant on wanting to make this switch.
Does Leveraged Finance have any overlaps with the negatives mentioned above? What is the work like? Is it more excel-focused with quicker deal processes? I would appreciate any additional color
Sunt et maxime doloribus expedita velit ea. Doloribus atque quia eveniet ut officia ea in. Similique pariatur nam non nisi at maiores recusandae.
Cupiditate architecto consequatur laudantium. Vitae consequatur sunt praesentium amet et non quos. Qui quia provident unde sequi inventore ipsam.
Mollitia deleniti maiores est enim magni. Repudiandae saepe id consectetur vero ex enim quod.
Hic nesciunt cumque corporis. Quidem qui id unde facere iusto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...