McKinsey vs Goldman (Network Affinity)

  1. Do McKinsey alums in industry tend to pull harder (than GS alums) for junior exits (at startups, strategics, funds)
  2. Is it difficult to exit to startups/corporate strategy from GS (Bay Area) or as a PE associate?
  3. Is GS at a disadvantage (compared to McK) for deferred or regular mba admissions to gsb/hbs? 

    Apologies for the braindead comparison, I know they are different industries but just trying to gauge if I must re-recruit given long-term goals in corpstrat, product and vc
5 Comments
 

When comparing McKinsey and Goldman Sachs in terms of network affinity and exit opportunities, here's what you need to know based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Network Affinity for Junior Exits:

    • McKinsey alumni tend to have a stronger pull for junior exits into startups, corporate strategy, and funds. McKinsey's global network is vast and influential, with alumni often occupying leadership roles across industries, including startups and Fortune 500 companies. This makes it easier for McKinsey alums to leverage connections for introductions and opportunities.
    • Goldman Sachs alumni also have a strong network, particularly in finance-heavy roles like private equity, hedge funds, and investment management. However, for roles outside of finance, such as corporate strategy or startups, McKinsey's network is generally more advantageous.
  2. Exiting to Startups/Corporate Strategy from GS (Bay Area) or as a PE Associate:

    • Exiting to startups or corporate strategy from Goldman Sachs is possible, especially in the Bay Area, where the tech ecosystem is robust. However, the transition might be more challenging compared to McKinsey, as GS's brand is more finance-centric, and its alumni network is less concentrated in non-finance roles.
    • As a PE associate, transitioning to startups or corporate strategy can also be challenging unless you have a strong personal network or relevant experience. Consulting experience, particularly from McKinsey, is often seen as more directly applicable to strategy and operational roles in startups or corporates.
  3. MBA Admissions (GS vs. McKinsey):

    • McKinsey has a slight edge over Goldman Sachs when it comes to deferred or regular MBA admissions to top programs like GSB and HBS. McKinsey's reputation for developing generalist problem-solving skills and its strong alumni presence in MBA programs make it a preferred feeder for business schools.
    • Goldman Sachs is still highly respected, but its focus on finance may not align as broadly with the leadership and strategic focus that MBA programs often emphasize. McKinsey's broader industry exposure and global network can give candidates a more compelling narrative for MBA applications.

Recommendation:

If your long-term goals are in corporate strategy, product management, or venture capital, McKinsey is likely the better fit due to its broader network, stronger pull in non-finance roles, and better alignment with MBA admissions. However, if you're already at GS and considering re-recruiting, weigh the opportunity cost carefully, as GS still offers a strong brand and network, particularly in finance-related fields.

Sources: McKinsey vs. Bain for Private Equity MF Exit, Q&A: Former MBB Consultant, IB SA No Offer -> Major Entertainment Strategy + Perspectives on Recovering from Failure, Have I messed up my future?, If You're Stuck Choosing b/w Consulting and Banking, DO BANKING

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful
  1. I did GS IBD and I find alumni very open to connecting, however, the distribution of exits from the firm are more concentrated to investing roles (PE, VC, etc.) than McKinsey (which funnels people into a range of operator roles at startups and corporate strategy/operations roles). I also think the McKinsey name opens more doors in business generally so non-alumni are more willing to meet with a McKinsey alumni than GS alumni, especially when you leave the finance realm. So it depends on which exit you're looking to optimize for.
  2. The longer you stay on the finance track, the harder it is to transition into a function outside of finance in corporate strategy/startups. So, yes, it's harder as. PE associate than an IB analyst. Both consulting and banking funnel people into bizops or strategy and operations at startups. I think you're splitting hairs here on views of candidates leaving IB or consulting, however, I do think there's more consultants that end up in bizops than bankers because a lot of bankers want to move onto PE after 2 years whereas more consultants want to move into tech or outside consulting after 2 years.
  3. No idea. I've seen enough people from McKinsey (or other MBB) and GS (and other BB IBD) at business schools. I think other factors come into play here including your narrative (long-term goals, what business school will offer you, your undergraduate background) and interviews. 
 

Molestiae quo atque qui non magnam cumque sint aliquam. Dolores deleniti similique dignissimos eum quaerat tempore laboriosam. Eligendi quidem rem et eos. Facilis veniam in delectus est et odio. Consequuntur molestiae expedita harum et necessitatibus itaque. Optio vitae ipsa atque ut nemo dolorem sint.

Id nihil et rerum mollitia cupiditate. Est est molestiae nesciunt corporis. Omnis voluptas harum neque fugit accusantium blanditiis. Voluptas et exercitationem aperiam eaque sunt occaecati dolor. Nam corporis amet est quaerat sed vel a.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Boston Consulting Group 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.5%
  • Oliver Wyman 98.0%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Consulting

  • Cornerstone Research 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.5%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.0%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.5%
  • Boston Consulting Group 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.5%
  • Oliver Wyman 98.0%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $361
  • Principal (30) $294
  • Director/MD (58) $274
  • Vice President (53) $247
  • Engagement Manager (111) $232
  • Manager (167) $172
  • 2nd Year Associate (185) $142
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (114) $134
  • Senior Consultant (354) $132
  • Consultant (634) $122
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (162) $121
  • 1st Year Associate (575) $121
  • NA (16) $114
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (390) $104
  • Associate Consultant (175) $100
  • 1st Year Analyst (1150) $90
  • Intern/Summer Associate (205) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (624) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”