Midwest banks: HL Minneapolis vs Baird Milwaukee vs Lincoln Chicago

insights into these options? Chicago is the city of preference for me but more location agnostic than most. How do PE placements, culture, comp stack up? Lincoln seems to be the culture leader but any thoughts are helpful. 

6 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of your options:

1. Lincoln International (Chicago):

  • Culture: Lincoln is noted for its growing presence but has been mentioned on WSO for some negative reasons in the past. However, it is often regarded as a culture leader among the three, which could be a significant advantage if you're prioritizing fit and work-life balance.
  • PE Placements: Lincoln has a solid reputation for middle-market deals, which can provide good exposure for private equity exits. However, it may not have the same level of prestige or network as some larger firms.
  • Compensation: Specific comp details aren't provided, but as a middle-market firm, it should be competitive within the MM IB space.

2. Baird (Milwaukee):

  • Culture: Baird is well-regarded for its strong culture and employee satisfaction. It’s often highlighted as a great place to work, especially for those who value a collaborative environment.
  • PE Placements: Baird has a strong reputation in the middle market, and its analysts and associates often place well into private equity roles, particularly in the Midwest.
  • Compensation: Competitive for middle-market investment banking, though Milwaukee’s lower cost of living can make the comp go further.

3. Houlihan Lokey (Minneapolis):

  • Culture: HL is known for its strong restructuring practice, but in Minneapolis, the focus is likely more on middle-market M&A. The culture can vary by office, but HL generally has a reputation for being more intense compared to Baird or Lincoln.
  • PE Placements: HL’s strong deal flow and brand name can provide excellent exit opportunities, including private equity. However, the Minneapolis office may not have the same level of prestige as HL’s larger offices.
  • Compensation: HL typically offers competitive comp, and Minneapolis’ cost of living is also favorable.

Key Considerations:

  • Location Preference: If Chicago is your top choice, Lincoln would be the most logical option. However, Baird in Milwaukee is a close second, especially if you value culture and are open to Milwaukee’s proximity to Chicago.
  • PE Placement: All three firms provide solid middle-market PE exit opportunities, but HL’s broader brand recognition might give it a slight edge for national placements.
  • Culture: Lincoln seems to lead in culture, followed by Baird. HL might be more intense, depending on the office.

If culture and Chicago are your priorities, Lincoln could be the best fit. However, if you’re open to Milwaukee, Baird offers a strong combination of culture and PE placement potential.

Sources: Top Industrials Shops in Chicago - Top IB Chicago, B Riley, Blair, Stifel, Baird, Lincoln - Any Insight?, bb chicago or mm chicago for IB?, Top Chicago IB, Top Chicago IB

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

If HL RX, this isn’t much of a competition. HL RX>>>others in terms of exits, and TC. If Chicago is a long term goal—and is your functional North Star—paying your dues at a shop like HL rx for a couple years probably nets you better opportunities than a shop like Baird, but you should discount your years not in Chicago working at HL relative to being in Chicago sooner. If it’s not HL rx, then it’s a bit more of a crapshoot imo.

The culture probably goes to Lincoln, but that’s mostly because Baird Milwaukee is mostly Industrials focused, HL MPLS is super fratty.

 

Aut amet ducimus sit quisquam laudantium qui. Consectetur nemo excepturi perspiciatis exercitationem doloremque quia voluptatem.

Pariatur aliquam est exercitationem provident cum maxime blanditiis. Ipsa non consectetur modi et eaque modi. Dolor eum ut aut odio vel.

Temporibus sint dicta aliquam eius. Fuga aperiam quia quaerat saepe magni in saepe inventore. Nulla nulla repellat debitis veritatis ut. Aut ad id et aut. Dolores minima nesciunt cumque quia dolor. Et temporibus in voluptas quasi.

Repudiandae repellat consequatur quae rerum dolorem iste. Excepturi inventore ab accusamus sed et saepe voluptatem. Et dicta et impedit earum mollitia. Mollitia possimus labore omnis rerum asperiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”