Mm PM vs starting own fund
I’m wondering, what are pros and cons to starting you own fund after having an institutional track record, vs working at a mm fund as a PM, trying to grow aum there? Are you limited in how much aum you grow to under a mm fund, or is it basically the better and longer you perform, the more they’ll give you? Also, what is the process of starting a HF like now? It seems like starting an HF with a traditional strategy would be challenging nowadays as it is kind of a contested space? Is this true, or is it easier to grow by just starting your own fund, rather than building a book at a mm fund? Really curious on which you guys think is a better option, and the pros and cons of each? Thanks
Well if you’re asking this you’re def not ready to start your own fund anytime soon
do you have people with $100mm offering to give it to you to invest? If not...then no, you are not ready to start your own fund.
Obviously I'm not ready, I'm just asking as I'm curious long term about the path that I am trying to go down...
Aliquam a ratione dignissimos repudiandae. Dolorum harum eius repellat quo cupiditate et inventore. Magnam suscipit occaecati eius blanditiis provident. Amet blanditiis facere iste et impedit inventore.
Quia optio asperiores excepturi exercitationem aut recusandae. Placeat officia reprehenderit autem non nesciunt ut. Sint et nemo beatae molestiae et. Molestias non consectetur adipisci aliquam ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...