Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +174 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 71 | 2h |
| +132 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 2d |
| +92 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 19 | 6m |
| +71 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 12 | 23h |
| +62 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 21 | 4h |
| +51 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 41 | 4h |
| +37 | Investment Banking is Hard | 16 | 6h |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 2d |
| +28 | PWP vs BofA | 21 | 18h |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 6d |
Career Resources
Stock-based comp doesn't "bring in cash" (ie it doesn't represent employees exercising/buying options); it's an addback because it's a non-cash expense.
I knew that about SBC; I'm having one of those days of little sleep the night before and cannot think clearly on anything - I should NOT be at work today. But a purchase plan, if I'm not mistaken, would bring in cash. The Company deducts pay from employee paychecks and then uses those funds to purchase stock at approximately 85% of its market value. That would be a source of cash. However, the Company did not show that in their cash flow statements in prior years - at least not as a segregated item. Thoughts?
Consequuntur tenetur sequi ut alias harum. Animi earum enim sed ducimus non molestias blanditiis. Animi eos eaque voluptas. Ex est amet illum magni et tempora quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...