Most intellectually stimulating product group?
Currently in coverage. Hate it. Tired of the clients bullshit. I think I’d much rather be in a product. Which is the most intellectually stimulating?
Currently in coverage. Hate it. Tired of the clients bullshit. I think I’d much rather be in a product. Which is the most intellectually stimulating?
| +253 | Earliest you can get fired | 46 | 6h |
| +244 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 41 | 7h |
| +236 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 47 | 2h |
| +228 | MBB Pay Raises | 47 | 7h |
| +212 | Career Crossroads | 25 | 7h |
| +209 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 48 | 3h |
| +200 | Investment Banking is Divine | 34 | 2h |
| +192 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 38 | 7h |
| +191 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 28 | 7h |
| +189 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 44 | 2h |
Career Resources
I'm gonna start this by saying I've only worked in Power and Energy coverage for M&A and ecm/dcm transactions so keep that in mind. But I'd say it is Power and Energy M&A becuase the modeling from what general consensus is and my opinion, is that its some of the hardest to do in all of IB and in general. On top of that the actual assets you are dealing with are things like Power Plants of all different variety (gas, oil, renewables). There are also variations of gas power plants CCGTs, CTs, steam turbines, etc which all have there own nuances. Then you have energy such as midstream O&G and utilities which are always interesting. The technical terms for all of these assets are also very mechanical engineering based obviously, which I personally find very interesting since before college I was weighing on finance or engineering.
I agree on that point. There’s also a ton of technology in the energy space. Specifically, OFS is a technology and engineering based business. Upstream valuations have to take into account geology, decline curves, price sensitivities. Midstream is interesting but I find it to be the least stimulating. However, downstream and power seem super intriguing but I haven’t touched those sectors. Tons of nuance in the entire energy industry.
Fuga voluptatum provident architecto quas fugiat a omnis. Consequatur ipsa sit qui quam quisquam omnis. Odit est est illum perspiciatis aut maiores unde. Numquam laboriosam doloremque nihil. Minima veniam aperiam quo consectetur. Et consequatur voluptates aut asperiores inventore sint nobis neque.
Laboriosam ut quos non illo nobis quia sapiente officiis. Laboriosam rerum facilis voluptas mollitia. Ab veniam et a nisi aut perspiciatis. Dolorum at quibusdam ut corrupti perspiciatis quam. Enim neque autem consectetur. Modi incidunt mollitia atque sit.
Quisquam assumenda molestiae itaque neque et esse iure deserunt. Ducimus perferendis illo voluptates et illo ut quisquam. Et est modi vitae quas. Nulla ea odit cum suscipit mollitia voluptatem assumenda.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...