8 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown to help you navigate your decision:

JPMorgan LA Mid-Cap Investment Banking

  • Pros:

    • JPMorgan is a top-tier name in the industry, which carries significant prestige and credibility.
    • Mid-cap groups often provide broader deal exposure, allowing you to work on a variety of transactions and gain a well-rounded skill set.
    • Strong platform for lateral moves or internal mobility within JPMorgan, which could open doors to other groups or regions.
    • LA is a growing hub for investment banking, with increasing deal flow in sectors like media, entertainment, and real estate.
  • Cons:

    • Mid-cap groups may not have the same level of deal size or prestige as large-cap groups, which could impact exit opportunities to top-tier private equity (PE) or growth equity (GE) firms.
    • LA might not offer the same tech-focused opportunities as SF, which could be a consideration depending on your long-term goals.

Jefferies SF TMT Group

  • Pros:

    • Jefferies SF TMT is known for its strong deal flow in the tech sector, with a solid mix of M&A and ECM transactions.
    • The tech focus aligns well with current market trends and provides exposure to a high-growth industry.
    • Exit opportunities are strong, with alumni frequently moving to upper-middle-market (UMM) PE and growth equity firms.
    • SF is the epicenter of tech, offering unparalleled networking opportunities and proximity to innovative companies.
  • Cons:

    • Jefferies, while highly respected, may not carry the same brand prestige as JPMorgan in certain circles.
    • The culture in Jefferies SF has been described as “sweaty,” which could mean longer hours and a more intense work environment.

Key Considerations:

  1. Long-Term Goals: If you’re aiming for tech-focused roles or exits into UMM PE/GE, Jefferies SF TMT might be the better fit. If you prefer broader exposure and a globally recognized brand, JPMorgan LA could be more advantageous.
  2. Location Preference: Consider whether you’d prefer to be in LA or SF, as the cities offer very different professional and personal experiences.
  3. Group Dynamics: Research the culture and deal flow of the specific groups. Networking with current analysts or alumni from both groups can provide valuable insights.

Ultimately, both options are strong, and your decision should align with your career aspirations and personal preferences.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/jefferies-sf-vs-greenhill-sf-vs-moelis-la?customgpt=1, What are the best groups for JPM?, Would you rather be in a TMT group or M&A group? Why?, Jefferies SA 2023, Citi or CS?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

If your goal is to stay in the WC, Jeff SF. JPM LA is a pretty unknown and small office and midcap is treated very differently even at a top BB. Lateraling/ft recruiting to alot of the bigger tech shops will be easier at jeff which is def on the up

 

NYC is definitely where alot of ppl want to be, JPM usually has pretty decent internal mobility so wouldn't hurt asking about location mobility too. if you want to lateral to NY you would basically be banking on the JPM brand and hoping they don't know too much about what you do in LA office. i would look at previous employees in that office and try to find out where they moved

 

I've seen internal mobility happen pretty easily for JPM (seen people in SF go to NYC). I think both Jeff SF and JPM LA MidCap are "fratty" to some extent. JPM LA MidCap does a lot of sponsor deals, so I would say lateraling also can be pretty easier with JPM on your resume.

 

Mid Cap LA is decent compared to the Chicago and NYC ones because the FSG and a lot of tech deals in WC can happen there with the SF office. Definitely better than other weird MM groups in other BBs lol

 
Most Helpful

Odio tenetur rem tempora eligendi autem quia. Accusamus perspiciatis earum nesciunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”