LOI Underwriting / Due Diligence

How much time/effort do you guys spend underwriting a typical acquisition, assuming there are no major issues (i.e. environmental contamination, etc.), before submitting an LOI compared to your post-DD underwriting? Let's keep this discussion to as is income producing acquisitions, not development since I'm not in that space.

I know this is a broad question and answers will depend on the deal, but I'm just trying to understand how much effort other put into uw'ing prior to getting access to all the DD materials.  

I would say that my team's underwriting used to make an offer is nearly as detailed as we can get considering the limited DD material available to us and without spending money on consultants (although we often call a contractor to get a rough estimate on any meaningful capex items we saw during the tour). Is this pretty standard? 

Idk whether my firm's approach is overkill, but it's bc my manager is super adamant about not retrading on things we could've/should've known about. I can appreciate his philosophy, especially if I were a seller/broker, but it seems like not everyone else is putting in that much effort until they have control.

7 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the level of effort and detail put into underwriting before submitting a Letter of Intent (LOI) can vary significantly depending on the firm's philosophy, deal type, and available resources. Here's a breakdown of the general approach:

  1. Pre-LOI Underwriting Effort:

    • Many firms aim to conduct as detailed an underwriting process as possible with the limited information available before submitting an LOI. This includes:
      • Reviewing all available materials (e.g., offering memorandum, financials, rent rolls).
      • Conducting property tours and identifying potential capex needs.
      • Engaging in preliminary discussions with contractors or other experts for rough estimates on significant items.
    • The goal is to minimize the risk of retrading (renegotiating terms) later in the process, which aligns with your manager's philosophy. This approach is particularly appreciated by sellers and brokers as it demonstrates seriousness and reliability.
  2. Post-LOI Due Diligence:

    • Once exclusivity is secured through the LOI, the due diligence process becomes far more detailed and resource-intensive. This typically involves:
      • Hiring third-party consultants for specialized diligence (e.g., environmental, legal, tax, IT, insurance, etc.).
      • Conducting a deep dive into financials, operational data, and other critical areas.
      • Negotiating purchase agreements and addressing any findings that could impact pricing or terms.
  3. Standard Practices:

    • Your firm's approach of conducting nearly as detailed underwriting as possible pre-LOI is not uncommon, especially among firms that prioritize maintaining strong relationships with brokers and sellers.
    • However, some firms may take a less rigorous approach pre-LOI, relying on the post-LOI diligence phase to uncover and address potential issues. This can sometimes lead to retrading, which is less favorable from a relationship standpoint.
  4. Philosophical Differences:

    • Firms like yours, which emphasize thorough pre-LOI underwriting, often do so to build credibility and avoid surprises later in the process.
    • Other firms may prioritize speed and flexibility, accepting the risk of retrading if significant issues arise during post-LOI diligence.

In summary, your firm's approach of detailed pre-LOI underwriting is a best practice for maintaining credibility and minimizing retrading, though it may require more upfront effort. This philosophy is particularly valued in competitive markets where reputation matters.

Sources: Overview of Sell-Side M&A, Overview of Sell-Side M&A, Life in Acquisitions (Analyst/Associate), Advice for New Analysts Seeking PE Exits

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

This is an interesting topic. I don’t think my feedback is relevant here since I’m a note buyer but we honestly don’t do much. We aren’t able to do third party reports really and sometimes you just need to make best guesses. Financials and rent rolls sometimes aren’t truthful so property visits are necessary. But for an LOI or first round, we just do a rough UW and chuck a # in that is probably on the conservative side. For best and final we will visit because 1) we need to see the asset 2) a seller wont give it to you if you haven’t seen it

 

It depends on the state of the market. There was a time where you could wet your finger and feel the wind to know if a deal would work. Hell, there was a time that you didn’t even need to do that. 

Right now? You probably want to do as much diligence as possible. 

...but is it REPE?
 

I am a data center developer that also invests in small multifamily (2-10 units) in the greater DC/Baltimore/Richmond area on the side. 

For my side investing, I know these areas pretty well. I have a well-defined investment standard (that is incredibly conservative where sometimes I am amazed at how many opportunities actually pencil out). It generally takes me ~1 hour of "desktop" work and 1 site visit to get to an LOI. I can tell pretty quickly if something is worth my time or not. I will fully diligence once we get a signed LOI, but for these types of deals, there really isn't that much diligence that is needed.  

 

For me it depends on the purpose. Am I trying to actually compete? Then I spend a lot of time going over the information I have and tour the site before I paper an LOI. Probably 5-6 hours of underwriting and market research to ensure all my assumptions are sound.

Then other times I'll just lob LOIs to get on bid sheets knowing its overpriced, and wait for the market to speak to the seller - and hope brokers reach back out to interested parties after the seller has lowered expectations.

 
Most Helpful

Nihil ut quo iure est dolorem omnis. Laborum odit incidunt esse error sint. Et libero modi dolore quam aliquam ab odit. Quam dolores cupiditate ipsam eveniet. Porro et ut nam perferendis in sed ad.

Assumenda nihil aspernatur eos iusto dicta. Maxime rerum distinctio iure consequatur quaerat. Nemo quaerat eaque et officiis. Saepe laudantium qui qui vel laboriosam vel voluptatem.

Consequatur quibusdam nihil aliquam laboriosam repellat quo nemo. Earum facere laborum itaque laborum et dolores. Dicta cumque ipsum et quibusdam culpa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”