Nexans is paying EUR 680M plus up to EUR 43M for a copper and aluminium wire maker with EUR 520M revenue. Do revenue multiples mean anything here?

Nexans agreed in April 2026 to buy Republic Wire, a family-owned Cincinnati manufacturer of low-voltage copper and aluminium wire serving electrical wholesalers, utilities and municipalities across the US and Canada. The price is EUR 680M, with a further earn-out of up to EUR 43M. Revenue is EUR 520M.

That is about 1.3x revenue on the base price. But for a metals-based product, revenue moves with the copper price, so a sales multiple can look cheap or rich just because of where metal prices were that year.

For bankers: what do you anchor on in a deal like this, value-add per pound of wire, EBITDA per unit, or something else? How do you handle the earn-out in a fairness or precedent analysis, and does a European strategic buying a US family business change the way you build the story for the board?

2 Comments
 

In deals like this, revenue multiples can be misleading, especially for a metals-based product like copper and aluminum wire, where revenue fluctuates with commodity prices. Here's how you might approach the valuation and analysis:

  1. Anchor on EBITDA or Value-Add Metrics:

    • Revenue multiples are less reliable due to the volatility of metal prices. Instead, focus on EBITDA multiples or value-add per pound of wire. These metrics better capture the operational efficiency and profitability of the business, independent of raw material price swings.
    • For example, EBITDA per unit or EBITDA margin can provide a clearer picture of the company's performance and its ability to generate cash flow.
  2. Handling the Earn-Out in Valuation:

    • The earn-out (up to EUR 43M) should be treated as contingent consideration. In fairness or precedent analysis, you might:
      • Include the base price (EUR 680M) as the primary valuation anchor.
      • Model scenarios for the earn-out, such as a probability-weighted approach, to estimate its likely impact on the total purchase price.
      • Present both "base case" (EUR 680M) and "maximum case" (EUR 723M) valuations to the board, ensuring transparency about potential outcomes.
  3. European Strategic Buying a US Family Business:

    • The cross-border nature of the deal introduces additional considerations:
      • Synergies: Highlight potential synergies, such as cost savings, expanded market access, or operational efficiencies, which could justify a premium valuation.
      • Cultural and Operational Fit: Address integration risks, especially given the family-owned nature of Republic Wire and its established relationships in the US and Canada.
      • Currency and Regulatory Factors: Account for currency exchange risks (EUR/USD) and any regulatory hurdles in the US.
  4. Building the Story for the Board:

    • Emphasize the strategic rationale: Nexans' expansion into the US and Canadian markets, diversification of its product portfolio, and potential synergies.
    • Use precedent transactions in the wire and cable industry to benchmark valuation multiples, focusing on EBITDA rather than revenue.
    • Address the commodity price impact by normalizing revenue and EBITDA for fluctuations in copper and aluminum prices, ensuring the board understands the underlying profitability.

In summary, while the revenue multiple (1.3x) provides a quick snapshot, it's not the most reliable metric here. EBITDA multiples, operational metrics, and strategic considerations should take precedence in evaluating and presenting this deal.

Sources: Beginners Guide to Valuation and Metrics By Sector, Biotech finance part 2: valuation methodologies and modeling considerations, Beginners Guide to Valuation and Metrics By Sector

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Tenetur cupiditate harum cupiditate laborum aut. Cupiditate sunt placeat reprehenderit enim repellat modi.

Molestias excepturi ullam quo assumenda minima in. Neque id impedit nihil ex. Assumenda dolorum consequatur vel deserunt eum omnis qui.

Sit quam adipisci reprehenderit iusto. Aut eum maxime ipsum in veniam accusamus. Ad ratione vel sint commodi amet excepturi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”