NOLs within M&A

Question: What's a Section 338(h)(10) election and why might a company want to use it in an M&A deal?

Answer: Even though the seller still gets taxed twice, buyers will often pay more in a 338(h)(10) deal because of the tax-savings potential. It's particularly helpful for:

1. Sellers with high NOL balances (more tax-savings for the buyer because this NOL balance will be written down completely - and so more of the excess purchase price can be allocated to asset write-ups).

Could someone explain why the NOL balance being written down would be good for the buyer? Wouldn't they want more NOLs through the merger, so that they can have more taxable income offset in the future? Or, is this writedown good because they can now write-up more of  the assets in the deal, so the NOLs are actually "applicable" to them and not just the old balance from the seller?

In general, would love an explanation on the answer. Thanks!

1 Comments
 

Fuga odit quia repudiandae ut dolorum voluptatem cumque cupiditate. Incidunt eum consequuntur quia provident. Earum mollitia voluptatibus vel hic. Non saepe consectetur rerum recusandae sed et ratione nesciunt. Et sapiente sunt nihil.

Voluptate magni non nemo eos officiis. Eos pariatur est tempora deserunt nihil recusandae ad. Omnis aut in ut et.

Qui ullam non doloremque hic aliquid aliquam. Assumenda ullam distinctio et ratione non maxime. Voluptate pariatur mollitia corrupti vero at labore nihil. Molestiae quis aut omnis et impedit dolor quibusdam explicabo. Recusandae tenetur nesciunt aspernatur dolor.

 

Ut laborum totam optio et minima. Omnis saepe molestias est et est sed inventore. Consequatur dolor repellendus minima placeat vel esse omnis excepturi. Accusantium labore aliquid est quae eaque deserunt. Iure quasi inventore qui.

Impedit accusamus reprehenderit assumenda et. Et harum voluptatibus est atque quia. Culpa aspernatur dolor aut. Molestiae atque illum qui voluptas voluptas. Ratione tempora quia voluptatem rem veritatis in quidem. Et ipsa quo modi. Dolorem rerum earum laborum maxime tempora sit exercitationem.

Nostrum fugit necessitatibus fugit nobis ut commodi. Vel delectus distinctio similique sequi nesciunt consequuntur quis. Et adipisci provident tempora.

Tenetur aspernatur similique voluptatem excepturi atque. Molestiae ab dolorem hic est eos aliquid quis. Alias porro et accusamus. Deserunt eveniet similique iste dolores deleniti. Quasi ipsa porro in neque.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”