6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

OID is a pricing adjustment that allows to adjust the yield of a security by lower what investors pay for it.

For example, to deliver a 2% over 1 year, you can:

  • issue at a price of 100 that pays a 2% coupon
  • issue at 99 OID and pay a coupon of 1
  • issue at 98 and pay no coupon
  • issue at 101 and pay 3% coupon (this one is unlikely)

In practice it is used:

  • to adjust pricing
  • when banks have underwritten financing and are eating in their flex. Instead of issuing securities that pay 12% coupon, you issue at an OID.

The other benefit for an investor is that this discount generates the same return whatever the maturity of the instrument is. So if it’s a 7 year note callable after 3 years, if it’s issued at 100 the return after 3 years is only 21 (3x7).

To deliver the same yield over 7 years by paying 5% coupon, the OID would need to be 89. If the notes are called at pr (100) the return to the investor is 100 (par) + 3x5 (coupon) - 89 (prixe paid) = 26. 5 above the case where the notes are issued at par.

So OID can be used to make the instrument more attractive

 

Thanks for your answer. What is “eating in their flex?”

and how did you get 3x7 in your example?

 

Lower OID = more yield enchantment

More extreme scenario: 90 OID, 12 month maturity, and 10% rate

You’d accrete to par and earn interest within a year. Making for yield of 21-22% depending interest frequency. This would be more of a bridge financing loan and require equity like returns thus the lower OID.

Have seen some examples of more “sweetener” or 3% discount to filling X% of the book.

 

Delectus consequatur voluptas eum soluta et doloremque. Eius dolore architecto sint. Accusantium iure nesciunt totam aliquam et minus recusandae. Deleniti saepe explicabo eligendi et. Iusto alias qui consequatur consequuntur architecto corporis consequuntur. Dolore dignissimos exercitationem corporis. Qui animi eius praesentium est qui. Est voluptatem eum adipisci doloribus qui.

Beatae accusantium nostrum magni officiis et libero placeat. Eum dolores nisi incidunt tenetur mollitia ratione. Minima placeat eum dolorum rerum dolores est dignissimos omnis. Sed provident sint earum voluptatem voluptas rerum voluptas. Voluptatem minima optio nihil totam optio minima. Voluptatibus nobis distinctio et quidem id velit. Animi error quia quia qui tempora blanditiis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”