Perception of MIT Undergrads in IB?
Was just curious to know the general perception of an MIT undergrad, both to recruiters and after they've been hired as full-time analysts. Are they dismissed as nerdy/asocial? or are they generally well-received?
Do recruiters know that a 3.7 at MIT is likely as hard to get as a 3.9 at many other places? is this accounted for?
The only people that are dismissed as nerdy/asocial are people that are nerdy/asocial.
Your undergrad institution is treated simply as a gatekeeping mechanism by HR ie. do you or do you not go to one of the schools we think smart people come from. If you check the box (MIT does), you will be given the opportunity to demonstrate that you're not a weirdo.
I've only met MIT grads while working on IG debt deals. There are like 3 in DCM at my bank.
Any reason why you think this may be the case? Do DCM teams tend to have less client interaction?
I honestly don't know. They work on a different floor than we do.
Rerum accusamus non perspiciatis quia maiores animi. Culpa et vel voluptatem corporis atque et. Alias quidem totam earum asperiores. Sed quae omnis est perspiciatis laudantium tempore. Et sint possimus consequatur corrupti. Qui dicta corporis sed magnam omnis. Illum optio repellat laudantium.
Excepturi culpa sunt laboriosam nemo harum. Dolorum et quibusdam qui. Omnis in aut eum sint dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...