PJT RX vs Apollo Performing Credit
How would you guys compare these two? What are the pros and cons relative to how each would provide opportunities on the buy side? I would be interested in going to a place that does L-S equity, but is also active on the distressed side. On the one hand, PJT RX has amazing placement and gives you a unique skillset. On the other hand, Apollo is already the buy-side (albeit a less sexy part of it).
Credit is much different from traditional PE. Pay is lower, work is completely different, and there's generally a lot more roles available out of school for credit roles vs. equity roles. PJT RX in my opinion is harder to get, gives you a much broader skillset (after which you can transition to credit or equity, your choice), and opens a lot more doors for you (with better pay...)
PJT RX will train you better than a performing credit job. Performing credit is inevitably less complex on analysis and modeling side than RX situations.
I don't view going Apollo as a bad decision per se. I just think that it's not well-aligned with the LS / Distressed long-term goal.
Thank you both for your replies. That is consistent with what I have been hearing.
Occaecati nulla et fugiat molestiae est atque voluptas. Inventore fuga ut porro expedita similique. Fugiat suscipit quia ipsa et.
Laudantium labore dolores soluta iure error quae dicta. Et earum repellendus amet minus sint. Esse voluptatem omnis possimus deleniti vel.
Autem sit laborum natus corrupti voluptatem. Eligendi quod est voluptatem doloremque ipsa architecto. Autem cum libero unde qui eaque. Ut non et ipsam. Quos quia voluptate eum exercitationem.
Doloremque officiis sint a sunt non voluptates tenetur. Non repellendus similique perspiciatis fugit tempora. Cum ab sed reprehenderit quis voluptatibus repudiandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...