24 Comments
 

EVR PFG is not secondaries -- pay is miles below m&a. At Lazard the groups are combined, and PCA banking at EVR does pay more than m&a.

 

Yeah, comp progression is absolutely terrible. Had a friend lateral to traditional banking because of how shite the bonuses were at the associate level. People who stay past the analyst level are basically pigeonholed.

 
Most Helpful

I work at a PFG so can shed some light here. I have found there's a dearth of information about private funds groups on this website and much of what is available is outdated and / or inaccurate.

Private funds groups typically do fundraising for primary investments (private equity, hedge funds / private credit) and secondary investments. Secondaries groups, however, are more akin to traditional IB from an hours, compensation and required technical / quantiative analysis perspective so most of the below pertains to working on the primary side. 

Many of the top private funds groups are part of larger investment banks (e.g. Evercore, PJT Park Hill, UBS, Lazard, formerly Credit Suisse) while some are more boutique (e.g. Eaton, Mercury, Campbell Lutyens, Aviditi). 

Most private funds groups are typically split into two verticals: Project Management and Distribution. Project Management manages the fundraise from the GP side — puts together materials, coordinates with GPs etc. while Distribution is the group’s “sales” function — they go out to LPs  (endowments, foundations, family offices etc.) and try to sell the various products on the group's platform. 

Compensation depends on the firm but base salaries are typically in line with the group’s affiliate investment bank (where that is the case) while bonus is more variable. On the Project Management side, juniors (analyst and associate) receive anywhere from 50-100% of base salary in bonus depending on firm / firm performance. Most firms do not have juniors on the Distribution side but those that do pay equivalent with their peers in Project Management. It’s worth noting that a junior distribution person is also less likely to be expected to generate significant, if any, revenue for the firm and is probably more in a support role. 

Senior Project Management professionals (VP - MD / Partner) earn $400k to $1 million+. A successful senior-level distribution professional (VP - MD / Partner) can see more variable and outsized compensation as you are paid directly commensurate to the amount of revenue you have generated for the firm. In the hay day of capital raising, when fees were better and large-scale allocators were ramping up their private markets programs, a top performing distribution professional could have cleared eight figures (the number is now likely half that). Anecdotally, it's rumored an Associate at Evercore made $2 million one year shortly after the GFC when the above applied. That said, if you DON'T raise capital (i.e. no revenue), you don't get paid and could lose your job. So senior-level distribution could be described as higher-risk, higher-reward.

Note: my understanding is bonuses used to be larger but a lot of individual TC has been pulled forward into base salaries. 

 

Broadly agree with all of the above but that Evercore $2m associate comp is an absolute joke. The Evercore PFG business wasn't even established until shortly before the GFC (2007) and their secondaries business started even later in 2013 when they poached Nigel Dawn from UBS. Evercore's PFG and PCA were nonentities in the initial years after GFC, let alone year after. That's such a random rumor to start. That said, Evercore has been top 3 if not top 1-2 from 2016-present day in my opinion. The two sides have different balance sheets and the PCA side has continued to crush it. Primaries side (PFG) has really struggled the last couple years in particular though and is definitely a shell of its former self--but that's most placement agents these days anyway.

 
Moonshallow

Broadly agree with all of the above but that Evercore $2m associate comp is an absolute joke. The Evercore PFG business wasn't even established until shortly before the GFC (2007) and their secondaries business started even later in 2013 when they poached Nigel Dawn from UBS. Evercore's PFG and PCA were nonentities in the initial years after GFC, let alone year after. That's such a random rumor to start. That said, Evercore has been top 3 if not top 1-2 from 2016-present day in my opinion. The two sides have different balance sheets and the PCA side has continued to crush it. Primaries side (PFG) has really struggled the last couple years in particular though and is definitely a shell of its former self--but that's most placement agents these days anyway.

It might have been CS not Evercore

 

That was referring to secondaries -- on the GP-led side you'll effectively doing multiple, short-form LBOs on the portfolio companies in a fund. You then have to layer in assumptions on fees, carry, future projected returns on unfunded commitments. However, you have less information available, and because you're looking at a diversified portfolio you can go into less depth on any given company. Most of your energy will be focused on the assets expected to drive the majority of returns.

 

Omnis officiis maxime autem ullam et. Dolorum voluptate enim ab repudiandae est omnis. Expedita rerum esse maiores optio qui. Amet illo aut libero sit et quo libero. Rem nihil ut totam eum modi qui vel.

Ad ducimus illo ducimus quis quia. Rem labore totam nobis ipsam rem itaque perspiciatis.

Cum omnis exercitationem iure repellat enim delectus nisi. Aut accusantium accusantium voluptatem soluta perferendis hic. Consequatur ad et repudiandae quis asperiores ea. Sit voluptatem expedita autem provident illo laudantium aut.

 

Reprehenderit et laboriosam rerum voluptatem. Reprehenderit laboriosam temporibus corrupti dignissimos reprehenderit molestias odit. Velit qui quas quidem atque.

Eligendi nulla placeat dolorem sit laudantium iusto. Laudantium eos enim minus saepe autem dolorem. Voluptatem ratione ipsa beatae minus. Suscipit est repudiandae eaque necessitatibus aliquam non provident quia.

Qui corporis totam id nisi nobis. Quas ut aut laboriosam. Sunt provident sint est laboriosam. Dolorem sed veritatis praesentium. Consequatur est voluptatum porro neque quia omnis odit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”