Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +255 | Earliest you can get fired | 47 | 1h |
| +244 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 42 | 2h |
| +238 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 52 | 1h |
| +228 | MBB Pay Raises | 48 | 1h |
| +214 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 52 | 1h |
| +212 | Career Crossroads | 27 | 1h |
| +210 | Investment Banking is Divine | 35 | 1h |
| +206 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 39 | 2h |
| +204 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 29 | 2h |
| +204 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 41 | 1h |
Career Resources
If you might want to make an industry jump out of tech, go with GS/MS.
Otherwise exits are the same b/w GSTMT/MS Menlo and Qatalyst. Every MF tech PE and top GE/VC will interview you from either.
Also, there seems to be common misconception on this site that Qatalyst doesn’t have good buyout exits. I know from a close contact that pretty much no analysts there choose to pursue buyout each year, but the ones that do have consistently placed at top MFs for tech (SLP, WP, one turned down an offer at TB, etc).
It doesn’t seem like you’re at Q since I know for a fact their internship isn’t over yet, and if you’re unsure if you want to be in tech it’s unlikely that you made it through their interview process. But to anyone else debating between Q and a top BB for tech, hopefully this sheds some light on some of the relevant factors. Either way you can’t go wrong, just depends if you’re sure you want to pursue tech.