Best Response

a revenue build is a bottoms approach to estimating a company's sales. For example, for a retail company, you might attempt to model out revenue by sales by store taking into account geography, sq footage and various other factors, rather than just taking the previous years actual results and applying a growth rate to it. For a hospital company you might attempt to model out number of admissions and expected growth, pay per admit across various insurances (Medicare, Medicaid, private pay) and might even take into account pay by geography if the data is available among other factors. It leads to more precise estimates or at least has less margin for error than just slapping a growth rate to a previous year's revenue figure. Essentially, you are trying to model as closely as possible how the company makes it's money so that you have a sense of where your projections are coming from and the potential variance in them (also how most corporations think about their revenue generation). Depending on the industry and the amount of time you have, you will have more or less available data to do a detailed revenue build (same goes for COGS build, balance sheet builds, etc)

Ofcouse, most of the time the revenue build will be a one or two step process, and you will find the best research report or just apply median research growth rates to make life easier in banking.

 

Thanks a lot. Yea let me try to explain the specific rate. I'm basically looking at this old model and trying to teach myself how its done. I'm not completely familiar with modeling so naturally i have a few questions. Basically what is happening in the revenue projection is the model is taking last years revenue + 35% of this years revenue. The 35 % is the specific rate i was referring to. So i just dont know how they arrived at the 35% number to use. Its just labled as "build-up rate". Any ideas?

 

"taking last year's revenue + 35% of this years revenue"??? LOL

2008 Rev = 2007 Rev * (1.35)?

They probably didn't "arrive" at the 35%. Most likely, it's one of two scenarios... either the 35% is representative of a past historical revenue growth rate the company has experienced and it may have been adjusted based on company projections or it's based on a revenue growth rate from comparable companies. What's driving the revenue growth? New products? New markets? Expanded sales force? That's a high revenue growth rate. A traditional brick and mortar company is not going to make that kind of revenue growth unless there's a "story". Curious, is this company is a startup that just turned a corner or perhaps a tech company in a niche market - e.g. M2M?

 

I'll wait for more responses, but that was my thought as well. I think I was so astounded that he built such a complex and large model, and when I asked him why (I am literally still trying to understand his model 2-3 weeks later and I have firsthand exposure to it), he said this is what the end user wanted to see. No one will be able to understand this model. Just wanted to get a feel if anyone else has to develop absurdly large and complex revenue builds.

 

Depends on the business ... if this is E&P then you need to build it up by rig. If it is e-commerce with multiple business lines, you need to be detailed. It's pretty common sense - it doesn't always make sense to just multiply revenue by a static % increase. And even if management projects that way sometimes, we have to build it out in a more detailed manner.

If anything think of it as practice for your PE interviews :)

 

Voluptatum fuga unde hic. In ut illum qui. Aut sapiente et fugit est quae.

Ducimus laborum modi accusantium ex sit labore expedita. Rerum facilis neque illum accusamus accusamus. Quo aut et repudiandae et ut molestias quo. Repudiandae quidem nulla voluptas id saepe. Perferendis qui animi aperiam. Impedit et distinctio aperiam qui dicta.

Voluptas doloribus cupiditate quia facere accusamus in. Dicta omnis ad ut dolorum qui. Nobis ut exercitationem doloremque ex.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”