“I had a very positive experience with my mentor and I am truly grateful for the time, support, and guidance they provided throughout our sessions. From the very beginning, my mentor was extremely kind, approachable, and available, which made it easy to communicate openly, ask questions, and discuss both my goals and uncertainties about the next steps in my career.
One of the most valuable parts of the mentoring experience was the work we did together on my LinkedIn profile. We essentially rebuilt and improved it from scratch, carefully going through my previous experiences, skills, and achievements and discussing how to present them in a clearer and more effective way. My mentor helped me understand how important it is to have a strong and well-structured LinkedIn profile and how to use it to communicate my strengths, professional interests, and career goals. The feedback and practical suggestions I received were extremely useful, and I now feel much more confident about how I present myself professionally online.
Beyond my LinkedIn profile, I particularly appreciated the practical tips and honest advice my mentor shared with me about how to approach the next steps in my career. The guidance was not limited to improving my online presence, but also helped me think more strategically about where I want to go and how I can get there. I received valuable suggestions on how to position myself, what aspects of my profile to focus on, and how to approach future opportunities more effectively.
Another aspect I appreciated was my mentor’s willingness to listen and adapt the conversations to my specific needs. I never felt that the sessions were generic or simply followed a predefined structure. Instead, the discussions were tailored to my situation, which made the advice much more relevant and actionable. My mentor was patient when explaining things, encouraging when I had doubts, and constructive when pointing out areas where I could improve.
Overall, this mentoring experience gave me both practical tools and greater confidence in taking the next steps in my professional journey. I came away with a significantly improved LinkedIn profile, a clearer understanding of how to communicate my experience and strengths, and a better idea of how to approach my future career development.
I would definitely recommend this mentor to anyone looking for someone who is supportive, knowledgeable, and genuinely invested in helping others grow. Their kindness, availability, and practical approach made the experience extremely valuable, and I am very grateful for all the time and effort they dedicated to helping me.”
Interned at one of those last summer.
Hours: 10am - 1/2am M-F, Weekends mostly free
Comp: Better than M&A at associate+, been killing it, for Analyst lots of top bucket allocations
Modelling: None during internship, would be some for single asset GP deals... (not too familiar with financial sponsor teams... feel like they make very basic models too, but headhunters give them more credit during PE recruiting from my observation)
Exits: Lots of people stay on because of how lucrative it is, and hours are somewhat reasonable... those that want to do PE usually lateral to M&A IBD (either internally or externally) and recruit from there
Do you have any advice on getting up to speed in the secondaries space (books, papers, etc.) before an internship in a PCA group?
No books as this field is so new.
Coller has a good secondaries report. Follow secondaries firms on Linkedin, there sometimes also free webinars you can sign up for.
Which firm? Trying to find the other interns in my class lol
Can you PM me? Have a PCA SA interview coming up
Evercore -> does mix of GP and LP transactions
Lazard -> mostly GP transactions
PJT -> mostly GP... but head of group left to start his own buyside shop affiliated with Stone Point
I’m not very familiar with secondary advisory, but I’m curious what GP transactions look like. Is the LP/GP process synonymous with the buy side/sell side M&A process but selling and buying stakes in PE funds instead of companies?
Based on my observation, from a short virtual internship.
It is pretty similar to a traditional M&A process with some differences.
1. You are exclusively dealing with a group of sophisticated buyers and sellers. Historically, GP-led has been done only by funds that are underperforming. But now you have top-tier funds also exploring this option. The downside I see with that for an Analyst is that the GP would provide you with their model and take-point in answering DD questions
2. There are sometimes more emphasis on deal structuring than valuation... some structure don't even really require you to value to the companies
3. Similar to the point above, PCA provides value in terms of i) deal structuring, ii) auction process and less so in terms of (sector) industry knowledge. Most buyer questions are deferred to the GP
Guess all of the above are sorta "cons". The pros are probably the comp and also having a rare skillset in a fast-growing asset class
Also, it is almost all sell-side mandates.
Any insight on similar groups but at BBs at UBS/CS/Citi? Heard GS started a similar secondary advisory business
Evercore, Credit Suisse, Campbell Lutyens and Lazard seem to be the most active. PJT and Greenhill have lost a few people. GS new. Others I haven’t seen around much
Quasi perspiciatis aut similique saepe doloribus et. Exercitationem itaque ab nihil rerum amet sed. Qui perspiciatis deleniti libero dolor et tempore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...