Secondaries (PCA) vs. Sponsors IB groups

Going to be interning with an EB (Evercore/Lazard/PJT) in NY this summer and one of their strong subgroups focuses on secondary advisory. How does this differ from a true Financial Sponsors Group at, say, a BB like BAML/CS/Barclays? Modelling, hours, comp, exits after analyst or associate level?

 

Interned at one of those last summer. 

Hours: 10am - 1/2am M-F, Weekends mostly free

Comp: Better than M&A at associate+, been killing it, for Analyst lots of top bucket allocations

Modelling: None during internship, would be some for single asset GP deals... (not too familiar with financial sponsor teams... feel like they make very basic models too, but headhunters give them more credit during PE recruiting from my observation)

Exits: Lots of people stay on because of how lucrative it is, and hours are somewhat reasonable... those that want to do PE usually lateral to M&A IBD (either internally or externally) and recruit from there

 

Do you have any advice on getting up to speed in the secondaries space (books, papers, etc.) before an internship in a PCA group?

 

Which firm? Trying to find the other interns in my class lol

 
Most Helpful

Based on my observation, from a short virtual internship.

It is pretty similar to a traditional M&A process with some differences.

1. You are exclusively dealing with a group of sophisticated buyers and sellers. Historically, GP-led has been done only by funds that are underperforming. But now you have top-tier funds also exploring this option. The downside I see with that for an Analyst is that the GP would provide you with their model and take-point in answering DD questions

2. There are sometimes more emphasis on deal structuring than valuation... some structure don't even really require you to value to the companies

3. Similar to the point above, PCA provides value in terms of i) deal structuring, ii) auction process and less so in terms of (sector) industry knowledge. Most buyer questions are deferred to the GP

Guess all of the above are sorta "cons". The pros are probably the comp and also having a rare skillset in a fast-growing asset class

 

Minus necessitatibus deserunt maiores ipsa libero quis. Alias non voluptatum sit sit voluptas dolor. Expedita est quis cumque nihil officiis aperiam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”