Sources & Uses and Repayment of existing debt

Hi all,

I got a little bit stuck with the following case – I would be hugely grateful if somebody could help me with this!

Assuming an EBITDA of 100m, EV/EBITDA of 10x, debt of 75m and excess cash of 25m, how would the Sources & Uses look like? The maximum obtainable leverage of the target is 4.0x and transaction costs for the PE are estimated to 2% of the EV.

Given that net debt equals 50m, the EqV should be worth 950m.


Version 1 (cash free and debt free):

Uses: 

Purchase price of equity = 950m

Transaction costs = 20m

Sources:

New debt = 400m

Sponsor equity (plug) = 970m - 400m = 570m


Version 2:

Uses:

Purchase price of equity = 950m

Transaction costs = 20m

Repayment of existing debt = 75m

Sources:

New debt = 400m

Excess cash = 25m

Sponsor equity (plug) = 1045m - 425m = 620m


Is my understanding correct? Why is the sponsor equity in V2 50m higher than in V1? Is this because the transaction is not assumed on a cash free and debt free basis? Would any PE investor be willing to take over the difference between V1 and V2, or rather want to deduct the net debt of 50m from the EqV of 950m, so that the sponsor equity is at 570m again?


Many thanks in advance!


 
Most Helpful

Sorry I'm having a hard time following this question? I'm assuming you're coming in with a PE perspective. This company is worth $1B ($100M x 10x), and currently has $75M of debt and $25M of cash, implying an equity value of $950M, as you've noted. To buyout the company, a PE firm usually has to refinance and take out all the existing debt. Obviously the transaction should be levered as much as possible based on market investability, and the debt can be paid down over the course of the holding period. If the maximum leverage is 4.0x, $400M of debt can be raised. That means the sponsor needs to have an equity injection of $600M to make up the difference. 

So the S&U: 

Sources:

  • $400M new debt
  • $600M cash from PE firm

Uses:

  • $50M refinance of net debt
  • $950M buyout of old equity
 

Labore omnis ut quam non ea ut. Nesciunt praesentium ratione quo occaecati voluptates autem quaerat. Autem est ratione aspernatur et. Accusantium sapiente laudantium facilis repudiandae ad. Consequatur corporis eaque officia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”