Starting out in FIG IB

Hi everyone - was curious how starting an analyst stint at a FIG focused shop or in a FIG group may impact exits/career optionality down the line. Have heard both sides before:

- can pigeonhole you, deviates from EBITDA-driven valuation, you get classified as "the FIG guy", limits exits to FIG focused buyside shops
- extremely technical role, allows you to get more valuable deal experience (more steady deal flow as well), if you can learn FIG then you can learn other more "common" industries which can make you more desirable to HHs

overall, how limiting is starting out in FIG? if I am FIG-focused for a couple of years in my analyst stint, will it really limit optionality down the line?

7 Comments
 

Starting out in FIG (Financial Institutions Group) investment banking has its pros and cons, and its impact on your career optionality depends on several factors. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

Pros of Starting in FIG:

  1. Technical Rigor and Analytical Skills:

    • FIG is known for being highly technical, with unique modeling requirements like the dividend discount model (DDM) and a focus on regulatory and disclosure-heavy industries. This can sharpen your analytical skills and make you stand out as a technically strong candidate.
    • Buyside firms often appreciate the analytical depth FIG analysts bring, as it fine-tunes your ability to understand complex financial structures.
  2. Steady Deal Flow:

    • FIG groups often have a higher deal flow compared to other coverage groups, giving you more exposure to transactions early in your career. This can be advantageous when building your resume and gaining experience.
  3. Exit Opportunities:

    • While FIG can be niche, it is an active sector with significant buyside activity. Many large funds, including private equity (PE) and hedge funds (HF), have FIG-focused teams or look at FIG deals. Analysts with FIG experience can transition to these roles.
    • FIG analysts have successfully moved into generalist roles, though they may still be staffed on FIG-related projects due to their expertise.
  4. Reputation at Top-Tier Firms:

    • Being in a strong FIG group at a top-tier bank (e.g., GS, MS, JPM) can enhance your career prospects. These groups often have excellent placement records into PE and other buyside roles.

Cons of Starting in FIG:

  1. Perception of Pigeonholing:

    • FIG analysts are often labeled as "FIG specialists" by headhunters and recruiters, which can limit your ability to pivot to other industries. This is especially true if you are at a non-top-tier FIG shop.
    • Moving to generalist roles may require extra effort, as your experience will be heavily FIG-focused.
  2. Deviation from Traditional Valuation Methods:

    • FIG deals often deviate from EBITDA-driven valuation methods, which are more common in other industries. This can make transitioning to roles that prioritize these methods slightly more challenging.
  3. Niche Nature of the Sector:

    • FIG's focus on financial institutions (banks, insurance companies, asset managers) means your client base and expertise will be concentrated in this area. If you're unsure about long-term interest in FIG, this specialization could feel limiting.

Key Takeaways:

  • Optionality Exists but Requires Strategy: Starting in FIG does not have to limit your career, but you need to be strategic. If you're at a top-tier FIG group, the technical skills and deal experience can open doors to both FIG-focused and generalist roles. However, at smaller or mid-tier firms, the perception of being "pigeonholed" may be stronger.
  • Consider Your Long-Term Goals: If you're certain about pursuing a career in PE or HF, FIG can be a strong foundation, especially if you target FIG-focused funds. If you're unsure about your long-term goals, traditional coverage groups (e.g., TMT, industrials) or product groups (e.g., M&A, LevFin) may offer broader optionality.
  • Top-Tier vs. Non-Top-Tier FIG Groups: Being in a top-tier FIG group (e.g., GS, MS, JPM) can mitigate the risk of pigeonholing, as these groups have strong reputations and placement records. Non-top-tier FIG groups may make it harder to pivot to other sectors.

Ultimately, FIG can be a great starting point if you leverage its technical rigor and deal flow while keeping an eye on your long-term career goals. If you're proactive about networking and positioning yourself, you can maintain significant career optionality.

Sources: Why Should I Work in FIG Investment Banking?, Why Should I Work in FIG Investment Banking?, Is FIG a death sentence?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/thoughts-on-stone-point-capital?customgpt=1, JPM FIG vs Mid Tier BB FIG

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

I think you hit two of the crucial points of this discussion. 

  1. FIG is a unique vertical that is differentiated in almost every aspect from EBITDA driven businesses (valuation, modeling, operating structure etc.)
  2. FIG is difficult to learn, extremely numbers intensive (go look at a Bank CIM) and often has good deal flow, leading to meaningful reps in a difficult space

These two items can kind of offset each other in my experience. While you are definitely getting pigeonholed more than other verticals, the reps and nuance of FIG can often still allow you to be an attractive candidate for other verticals because of your process experience. This is most important at the junior level, I have seen tons of analysts and even associates in my group lateral to completely different verticals because of their process experience and technical knowhow. I think another element that gets lost in this discussion is how popular FIG is with sponsors as of late. Specialty lenders, AM's, fin Techs, insurance co's etc. are all extremely attractive sponsor targets and the space appears to be continuing to grow, leading to more buyside optionality. 

Overall, I would say that while FIG can be an initial pigeonhole, you will more than likely get valuable deal reps that will make lateralling to other verticals easier. I know people who have gone from FIG to O&G, Consumer, Industrials, TMT etc. It will likely not be a walk in the park to lateral but if you have your story straight and put in the effort, it is extremely doable.

Hope this helps!

 

Not a death sentence for skillset but you will probably focus on non-EBITDA businesses for most reps if you’re at a bulge. That said, there are tons and tons of EBITDA businesses that fall within FIG, especially in the insurance distribution and claims space. The problem is many banks either explicitly segregate FIG subverticals or implicitly do so via staffing. So if you get stuck on a depositories (banks, mortgage lenders, etc.) staffing, you might become the “depositories analyst,” which in turn does limit your development because depositories modeling is highly templated.

 

insurance is pretty vanilla ebitda - claims

"we do not reach the peaks of these mountains, without first learning to give up our want to surrender" - shanke koyzcan
 

Voluptas pariatur illum ullam sed recusandae rerum inventore. Ab totam debitis non aspernatur quam quas. Ut et quaerat cum modi delectus. Consequatur molestiae sit unde. Non tempora voluptatem quisquam non. Voluptate et consequatur asperiores sed. Earum mollitia pariatur eum ut porro.

Accusamus voluptas doloremque minus dolore sed aut suscipit. Nemo recusandae velit ut fugit quidem quia fuga. At molestiae recusandae eum ut sunt maiores consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”