Stock Beta
If a stock has a beta of 65%, does that translate to a beta of 1.65? By that logic, does a beta of 115% equal to 2.15?
Trending Content
| +143 | Investment Banking US League Table YTD 2024 (FactSet) | 83 | 1d | |
| +140 | Big Layoff at Barclays - 5/1/24 | 74 | 5h | |
| +126 | BofA Associate death? | 60 | 1m | |
| +83 | Would comitting to ATL İB be stupid? Please give feedback. | 45 | 2d | |
| +83 | “Americans just work harder” | 53 | 6h | |
| +68 | Sleeping on Jefferies??? | 32 | 5h | |
| +66 | A shitter's comprehensive guide to sophomore year recruiting | 7 | 4h | |
| +59 | NEED NY RESTAURANT RECOMMENDATIONS | 38 | 2d | |
| +57 | What's up with RBC nowadays? | 24 | 1s | |
| +48 | 5-Step (Borderline Psycho) Pre-Superday Routine I Used to Land Every IB Internship Offer | 4 | 1d |
Career Resources
Does 65% translate to 1.65? Think my brother, think.
I know the most obvious answer is for it to be 0.65 but for some reason one of my peers told me that I was wrong so it must just be a formatting thing as the below poster is suggesting
Are you looking at it in excel or something and the cell is formatted in %? Why would 65% be 1.65? Wouldn’t that be .65? Maybe I’m reading this wrong because of the gin?
Run this by your peer, see what he thinks. If beta is relative to the S&P and the S&P has a value of 1.....and a stock’s beta is 1....could it be that it is also 100%....of 1?
Non a at est rem soluta itaque consequatur. Culpa aut maxime illo. Culpa optio laborum quia. Quos voluptates quidem esse rerum sint est.
Et omnis consequatur magni ab voluptatem voluptate placeat. Enim vel officia aut et. Illo fugit sint et qui consectetur consectetur sequi quam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...