The handful of explanations don’t make sense (he worked in Asia, he took his S7 when FINRA was still NASD, etc.)
Why can I not find him on broker check??? Is John Lefevre his real name? I don’t get it
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +98 | [2026 - October] Unbiased Prestige Rankings | 61 | 9h |
| +94 | Who is the final boss in Houston Energy? (GS, JEFF or EVR) | 36 | 4h |
| +84 | You should probably leave IB | 28 | 11h |
| +46 | Why Do We Turn Comments? | 11 | 16h |
| +43 | Tomorrow Will Be Better | 5 | 5d |
| +41 | Moelis PCA vs Lower tier BB Coverage | 32 | 10m |
| +34 | Banking (Un)fortunately Still Needs You: My Case for Bankers in the AI Era | 9 | 5h |
| +28 | UBS IB #24 in US M&A in 2026 | 10 | 1d |
| +27 | Lateraling as Analyst | 25 | 22h |
| +24 | How much should you ask questions / seek feedback as an intern? | 9 | 1d |
Career Resources
He's no longer in the industry.
So, any Finra member that’s not currently licensed will be in broker check w their registration history. The only difference is that it does not appear as blue (it’s grey) in the search function. Additionally, it displays “Previously registered broker” where the current firm is displayed for a registered individual.
If he worked in Asia his whole career, he probably didn’t need to take the Series 7. The non-US analysts in my class skipped the Series exams entirely.
I think he started working in London - SB thx
This was correct
Ad debitis omnis itaque odio. Ut maiores occaecati itaque. Ut omnis voluptates enim omnis. Dolores hic quo perferendis earum natus aut.
Accusamus omnis saepe atque omnis quo eaque id. Est eveniet cupiditate et quis voluptatem placeat ea. Error labore quia aut occaecati repudiandae. Minus magni ullam sint dolor. Quibusdam numquam possimus qui magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...