Thoughts about IQ Exams as a pre-requisite to applying for IB Internships?

Do firms give pre-application exams to test for knowledge of financial topics or intelligence to pre-screen applicants?

Heard some places already have exams like this, or using pymetrics, but unsure if it’s like this everywhere. 

 
Most Helpful

That would be a fair way to screen potential applicants. If every ib firm had a short 1 hour finance / accounting related timed exam, you could probably get a much better pool of applicants and interview candidates knowing they all had to score above 90% to be able to apply 

 

IQ exams may not be a good proxy, but requiring exams on corporate finance + accounting knowledge would be a good screen to see which applicants are proficient on a technical level. People could then focus more of their interviews on behaviorals and fit 

 

Everyone in here acting like finance and accounting is difficult? I teach my 12 year old brother these topics. Just look at potential candidates grades and make sure they aren’t fucking weird. 

 

What are your thoughts of this system in the UK, and does that help create a more meritocratic system for hiring people? 

 

I’d say so, most people prep for these exams and so you can usually filter out the 1000s of applicants much faster and get down to serious candidates.

 

You have to be retarded to fail the online tests if you practise. They cut like the bottom 50%

 

Every applicant applying to analyst/internship programmes takes these tests. I can’t speak for how diversity candidates are benchmarked.

 

What are these UK based exams like? Are they finance or IQ exams and how long do they take to study for? 

 

Usually have 3-4 segments of numerical, verbal, and logic/abstract reasoning - effectively just psychometric tests. You can't really study for them, you just get it right or you don't (but some people pay a lot for practice tests)

 

In the UK we already have psychometric tests which test one or multiple of numerical, verbal, logical skills. Logicals are most similar to "IQ" tests i.e. pattern testing, but not many banks use them. 

We also have cultural fit/EQ/job sim tests.

Typically to get past these stages you have to score "excellently" in all stages. Sometimes your speed is also assessed so you need to be fast and accurate.

Works pretty well. I wouldn't say you have to study for the tests but some are pretty tricky first time so there are a few services which offer practice tests for different test providers that mimic the difficulty.

 

Never understood this. I wouldn't mind pointing friends to resources but why on earth would I myself add competition for myself through my own direct actions. Not to mention wasting my own time, losing respect for the person due to their laziness etc.

To each their own I guess. Maybe banks should bring back the in-person testing they used to do to check for this.

 

You don’t need EQ to do intern monkeywork either. That only matters as you get higher, but it’s important to be likeable and have social awareness, which many interns lack for a variety of reasons

 

It’s pattern recognition, which could help.

However it’s very easy to imagine multiple ways where someone could be awful at this job with a high IQ.

 

Screening for basic finance knowledge would probably at least help with screening for more serious applicants but some people don’t always learn finance knowledge until junior year or even later. I’m still learning new stuff every day about this field 

 

They should definitely have screens for personality and EQ prior to any applications, gotta make sure you’re working with people who are in a good headspace 

 

Since when did they start IQ or Personality screens for jobs in the US 

 

It's not necessarily a binary thing (ie threshold IQ met => can do the job), there's a lot more nuances to it than that. Generally you want decent academic credentials, strong business interest/acumen, the ability to think commercially, but more importantly communication. You will work with people who crack under pressure, don't communicate timelines effectively, don't explain things effectively, and are generally shit at delegating and managing multiple stakeholders. These things are a lot harder to filter for, and are the exact things you need from people within your team. Much moreso than a threshold IQ.

If, for whatever reason, you think you'd have an edge over others on the IQ side, I suggest you take some time to change your way of thinking. You don't sound like the type of person I'd wanna be sat next to for 14+ hours a day.

 

Lol OP are you saying you prefer if interns take IQ tests or you’re wondering if this is something companies ask applicants to fill out now? 
 

If the former, then you’re probably socially stupid af, even though many companies actually do administer these / pymetric exams as part of their application processes 

 

Yeah quite a few firms in the US already have these exams, a good way to pre screen candidates and make the application process more equitable 

 

It does increase your "headiness" and desire to get stuck in your own thoughts though. Also, sales is a stupid man's game, and IB is sales at the end of the day. The amount of times I have had a PhD carrying client downplay the achievements of his R&D heavy firm because of "muh intellectual honesty" is baffling.

...and the Truth shall set you free
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

would never in a million years happen in the usa

it would crater all DEI recruiting..period.

when firms have an incredibly hard time finding their goal number of DEI hires, they will be forced to lower the standard or apply a different standard to DEI (which they wont want to admit to doing)

will NEVER happen here.

 

If I’m a banker hiring an analyst, all I’d want to know is whether or not I’d enjoy working with the person. If they interview a few times and it flows nicely, they say the right things, boom hired. The work is easy at a certain point and everything is teachable.

Of course give them a test or whatever to make sure they’re not dumb, but at a certain point there’s no reason why we need to do any complicated testing or comparisons for punching numbers into spreadsheets.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

For one of my super days, it was a standard afternoon of 4 hours of interviews with several mid and senior level folk. Had great convos and generally vibed well with whole team, got all the questions right from the technical interview, and already networked with the staffer who was making the hiring decision. 
 

Then the last round was a 1 hour in-office finance / accounting test that everyone had to take. Passing score was 85%. The concepts tested in that exam were more advanced than what you’d learn from the 400 questions and biws guides, as we could use our phones and internet as reference during the exam.  

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

How about finance / accounting concepts exams instead of IQ? I don’t think IQ tests can gauge if someone could be a good intern / analyst but at least financial proficiency exams can tell you who is actually knowledgeable about finance 

 

The higher IQ guys at the Ivy League I went to ended up studying engineering, comp sci and other fields in academia. 

 

Yeah several firms I’ve interviewed in already have these.

Sounds like they implement this at the majority of places in the UK already

 

Barclays has this for US applications as well. Need to reach a certain score to qualify for interviews afaik

Good, heard Macquarie and HSBC also have pre-qualification exams. 
 

They should have any and all analysts take these and get above a certain score prior to being allowed to apply

 

This is a good idea. Baseline fundamental knowledge is required for IB before anything else. You don’t have to be a genius, but still need to be adequately knowledgeable in finance concepts to get a job in the field. 
 

Some people who majored in finance don’t always understand everything needed for the job. 
 

Firms should have a short 1-2 hour timed multiple choice finance exam where they test on a select bunch of relevant topics and require an 85-90%+ passing score. Those who pass can apply to a firm, and be assessed on important factors like EQ, personality, etc. 

We see this all the time in buyside interviews, where the first round is often a financial modeling exam followed by other rounds of technical interviews. 

 

Error accusantium similique possimus nihil. Eos soluta ratione aut accusamus repellat. Molestiae molestias praesentium accusamus unde repellat quia in et. Nulla quibusdam est repellendus harum ducimus. Repellendus nemo eius perferendis dolorem.

Omnis quia ut repellat aut dolorem at consequatur. Qui occaecati ut delectus mollitia mollitia quia. Cumque vel quae iste quis dolorum. Et velit quam asperiores nesciunt exercitationem. Nobis perferendis numquam omnis porro eius recusandae cupiditate.

Suscipit eum possimus omnis doloremque. Labore nam provident qui molestiae aliquid quis repudiandae maxime. Illo aut tempora sit est accusantium et. Est deleniti autem ea nihil.

 

Necessitatibus quia sit ut non facilis vero quibusdam. Necessitatibus dolore iste sunt perspiciatis eos. Possimus quaerat fugiat laboriosam modi eum voluptas fugit.

Possimus saepe sunt aliquam ex iure animi. Aut neque suscipit aut numquam hic eaque. Eveniet maiores voluptatibus est nobis iusto.

Rerum ut cum rerum. Veniam ex qui eum. Atque fuga quam a suscipit eius.

 

Voluptatem ea veritatis delectus laudantium ut. Voluptatem at ad quis ut voluptatum culpa. Iusto voluptas atque voluptate veritatis ab voluptatum.

Quia voluptate eos aliquam id dignissimos nostrum. Suscipit consequatur rerum et non tenetur. Enim nemo pariatur commodi. Vero quibusdam quisquam rerum quo explicabo. At sunt magni aut animi et aut.

Illo adipisci consectetur consectetur. Omnis quia quae laboriosam fuga. Praesentium eos eius molestiae fuga et. Laudantium adipisci maiores aut tempora in sed neque. Voluptate consectetur velit dolore assumenda. Odit a voluptas minima tenetur optio asperiores. Ad ipsum omnis aperiam odit perspiciatis tempore in qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”