Too many IB analysts seeking PE jobs?

I've been removed from the analyst program for 10 years when I got brutalized like so many of my cohorts. I wanted to know given that there are now so many analysts in the street (is it 50% more?) will getting into PE or HF be multiples times harder? Or are there much more opportunities out there now then there was 10 years ago.

12 Comments
 

There are more PE shops nowadays, too.

Of course All IB analysts want to go to top shops like KKR but there are plenty smaller, local PE shops find it hard to hire IB analysts to join. Analysts are being selective, too. There are quite a lot more PE shops out there.

 

i am guessing it's mad competitive since this is practically the #1 (and easily most lucrative) exit opp for ib analysts. they're all jumping on each other to make as fast an exit into pe as possible. so, i am guessing it's fairly competitive nonetheless..

 
Best Response

You have to remember that the recruiting environment in the March to July timeframe was at its peak, so it definitely won't be like this same time next year. But generally speaking, the top bucket analysts got first rounds wherever they applied (to my knowledge, anyways...noone I knew that was top bucket got denied a first round). The middle bucket analysts still found jobs, but primarily smaller firms (middle market average comp is slightly lower than what you'd make as a third year analyst at a BB in 2007). I knew a few middle bucket analysts that still got interviews at some pretty decent upper middle market shops (i.e. Code Henessey, Thoma Cressey) but no one who actually landed the job. But I have to believe that if you get a first round it's your job to lose.

 

The way I think about it there are mega-funds and funds right below the mega-funds. The tier directly below I consider to be shops in the 2-5bn range (i.e. GTCR, Silver Lake, H&F, Leonard Green, Welsh Carson, Stone Tower, Apax, etc.). Those two tiers hire almost exclusively from top bucket analysts, especially since having a smaller fund at that level doesn't necessarily mean you're less sought after. In fact, I would argue that these funds are just as highly sought after for their combination of historical performance, prestige, and (relative to the mega-funds) lifestyle.

Keep in mind that "middle market" describes almost every fund out there (if you define "middle market" as enterprise value of 500-1.5bn) and the term tends to be somewhat confused.

In terms of what % actually go from banking to PE, its very dependant on the group. In sponsors I would argue much higher, maybe 75-80%. In your average industry group maybe around 50%, but not everyone wants PE. For the most part in my particular group, everyone that wanted PE got it in some shape or form with the exception of maybe one or two.

 

GameTheory - did you mean to express the "middle market" size range in terms of enterprise value? I was just curious as I've rarely seen a fund's size referred to in this way (i.e., in terms of a fund's total potential buying power rather than its equity).

In any case, I generally tend to think of MM PE as being more broad - including funds ranging from $250 mm up to $5-7.5 bn.

 

GameTheory means funds that buy middle market companies (he's talking enterprise value of targets). And the point, I believe, is that even some of the firms investing large funds play in lots of middle market deals, some (cerberus) more than others (kkr or blackstone). Also, I think people probably underestimate h&f here (hoowa06 at least); they're top notch and their current fund is 8 I think, which is as big a fund as had ever been raised until 2+ years ago. And finally, not all top analysts go to PE, there are hedge funds (perry, maverick, sac) that attract smart smart guys too.

 

Minima ratione illum sed explicabo vel. Dolorum qui iusto dolorum error molestiae aperiam assumenda neque. Similique harum dolorum culpa odit quidem. Ut impedit veritatis soluta voluptas voluptatibus nostrum illo inventore.

Deleniti velit nisi est. At et in aut atque. Tenetur maxime perspiciatis sit unde aperiam voluptatibus. Ut officiis vel sed tempore nisi perferendis illo. Soluta dolores necessitatibus ut sequi. Et quis eos dignissimos facere accusamus impedit optio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”