UBS in 2025. If you were a client would you use them as an Advisor?
See below
See below
| +270 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 42 | 16h |
| +220 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 41 | 2d |
| +141 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 20 | 11h |
| +140 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 30 | 4m |
| +108 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 18 | 1d |
| +87 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 32 | 11m |
| +57 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 19 | 1d |
| +43 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 30 | 1d |
| +34 | Rate my non-target resume | 19 | 1d |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 1d |
Career Resources
Literally what’s the point of these posts? Actual clients will keep doing business with them, not like that a WSO trend is persuading them to change business.
Its the hottest new trend of 2025. Similar to unfollowing vexbolts
Who usually ends up picking the banker on the client side out of curiosity?
This is why some troll jobs need to be stopped. Banks win deals on relationships and terms, period. If the chosen banker of a corporate or sponsor is at UBS or some random boutique matters very little as long as they can be sure the group can execute (UBS has enough creds to prove they can). I suppose to answer your question, yes. UBS will indeed win deals if they have the best relationship with the client. UBS might not be top 10 in America, but it's just outside of that in M&A rankings at 12th and finished the year in top 5 or so for various broader sectors. UBS however has significantly stronger sponsor relationships than corporate ones,as per their broader deal flow.
Asked a simple question, we don't need the UBS propaganda infomercial. You seem pretty insecure about the UBS platform.
This is not an infomercial prospect, IB is a relationship business. People win business by having relationships with senior leadership, not by going on WSO and jerking themselves or their group off. This is not a fair question and anybody in IB would know that. Would I or any client in tech choose UBS? No. Would they be for materials? Much more competitive. All banks have things they are good and bad at. Given that clients still do select UBS though, on a broad stroke, this question is just absurdly stupid.
Imagine being a prospect IB person, receiving a thoughtful and correct answer from a IB professional, and then reply with this shit.
IMAGINE
Is UBS the new DB?
Probably, arguably worse than DB was
No because they don’t have diversity
Ut similique dicta sed minima nisi sit. Quibusdam odio doloremque recusandae maiores et voluptatibus molestiae. Est eius quia harum vel voluptatem tenetur. Similique autem quia odio eligendi.
Omnis dolores facilis veritatis. Occaecati est omnis sit unde. Nulla eligendi unde tempora recusandae. Consequatur corrupti ipsa tempora blanditiis minima ducimus. Est impedit facilis sed ut. Quos facilis ad velit ut praesentium.
Quia pariatur consectetur tenetur ut ea. Facere nostrum maxime omnis omnis aspernatur sit ut. Eos earum aspernatur aspernatur asperiores nihil eum. Aut ad quos aspernatur mollitia et id ut. Cupiditate molestiae quia quo libero iure ea. Nostrum recusandae facere doloremque sit. Culpa ut sint tenetur. Quos et dolorum iste autem consequatur aut repudiandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...