Using Claude for extra work on a case study

Hey monkeys,

I completed a 3-hour modeling test/memo, no AI needed and think I did pretty well. That being said, I like to be a star pupil and do extra credit when I can.

I added a lot to the model and fleshed out a more fulsome deal that I wanted to send to the firm ahead of the case study discussion.

Thoughts on using Claude to just do the deck?

Is it a big deal if this is for extra credit essentially? I like the visual work it can do and I’d obviously brush everything up and do the memo writing mostly myself where needed.

Thx in advance

7 Comments
 

Using AI tools like Claude for extra work on a case study can be a double-edged sword. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key considerations:

  1. Ethics and Firm Expectations: Many firms expect case studies and deliverables to reflect your personal skills and effort. Even if this is for "extra credit," using AI for significant portions of the work (like creating the deck) could raise questions about authenticity if discovered. Always ensure you're adhering to the firm's guidelines.

  2. Value of Personal Touch: While AI can help with visual elements, firms often value the thought process and creativity behind your work. If you rely too heavily on AI, you might miss an opportunity to showcase your unique approach and attention to detail.

  3. AI as a Tool, Not a Crutch: If you decide to use Claude, treat it as a supplementary tool. For example:

    • Use it to generate ideas or templates for slides, but ensure you customize and refine them to align with your narrative.
    • Focus on the memo writing and key insights yourself, as this is where your analytical skills will shine.
  4. Risk Management: If the firm asks about your process or reviews your work closely, be prepared to explain every detail. Using AI for "extra credit" might not be worth the risk if it undermines your credibility.

  5. Balance: Adding value to your case study is great, but don't overdo it. A concise, well-thought-out deliverable often leaves a stronger impression than an overly elaborate one.

In short, if you use Claude, keep its role minimal and ensure the final product reflects your skills and effort. The goal is to enhance your work, not replace your input.

Sources: 10 Tips to Maximize Your GPA, 10 Tips to Maximize Your GPA, Citadel (Surveyor) Case Study/Modeling Test, del

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

This is going to become a larger issue for case study interviews that are not live. My view is that if you did all of the analysis yourself and can speak intelligently to all the important aspects of the case if asked, then I don't see an issue with using Claude to assist in putting together the PowerPoint. They aren't going to ask you how you created a specific PowerPoint graph in the interview or ask you to describe how you aligned slide 7, but they might ask you to describe a certain section of the model you created. 

I don't think there is any way for them to tell if you used Claude for the PowerPoint presentation, and if they somehow could I am not sure they should care, especially if it is "extra credit". If you get the offer just make sure you brush up on PowerPoint if you aren't already experienced with it.
 

That being said, take my post with a grain of salt, I do not work in IB, but we are in that age of AI and I just expect everyone to be using it as this point. 
 

 

Appreciate it and completely agree. I built the model entirely from scratch, I just use Claude to iterate thru the cases after i build then to record case results. I figured it’s harmless to tell Claude to put a few slides together since I did all the analysis but alas, people are touch in our industry.

 

Yeah I ultimately decided just to keep it to a simple write-up, but I sent over my revised model. On your second point, I’ve been having some good experiences with it, and I work on pretty complex project finance models (i.e., renewables with tax equity).

I do all of the complex modeling work on my own, but I find it useful for figuring out the best way to model a formula that is stumping me

 

Corporis repellendus voluptatem enim ut. Perferendis error et nisi voluptatem quibusdam maiores a aut. Omnis minus facilis adipisci eligendi aliquam soluta. Consectetur nesciunt doloremque quidem autem repellendus earum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”