I am about to interview for a grad role at one of the big 4 acct firms. Which would be the better team, out of Vals & TS (I was able to apply for both), for me to strive for?
I am wanting to keep the door open to working in IB after a stint here, so I want to pick the team which will provide the more highly regarded experience for this
Thanks in advance!
| +139 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 24 | 15h |
| +90 | Incompetent and annoying co-intern | 23 | 1d |
| +74 | Getting Laid in IB? | 31 | 44m |
| +70 | Intern keeps sleeping at work - what to tell them | 29 | 1h |
| +56 | Living in greenwich as an analyst? | 12 | 1d |
| +47 | UBS Promotion or Lateral to Boutique? | 9 | 15h |
| +46 | PJT M&A Group Selection 2026 | 6 | 2h |
| +42 | NYC Associate Budget | 14 | 1d |
| +36 | Nauseous every morning for past 3 years in IB, anyone else? | 21 | 2d |
| +36 | Quick Thoughts on CVC AI Sale Process | 7 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Ts
Can only speak for US MM, but personally I think TAS/TS is more translatable. If you understand transaction accounting, you can add value managing QofEs, giving input on various things related to NWC and you have the foundation for modeling, even if it isn't quite as deep as valuation.
I also think the pressure and timeliness of transaction work helps to prepare you for M&A far better than valuation. Valuation also tends to be too theoretical (different purpose than deal work) and less individualized from a project perspective.
The people that we hire from valuation are wildly strong at modeling usually. They catch things and typically can wrap their brains around valuation really quickly. The TAS people typically, not all the time, seem to be much better at running a full deal.
Aligns with my thinking. So if you had your preference, which would you choose for an analyst? Which for an associate?
In a pure M&A or Coverage team role, TAS all the way.
TAS
This is the most common path going from public accounting to IB.
ex big4 TS senior con > boutique IB here - if you're wanting to transition to IB it will generally be easier coming from Vals. Interviews are heavily focussed on modelling at the junior levels and having vals on your CV is a big advantage. That being said, having a good stint in TS gives you a good framework that is super helpful across full deal cycle.
Similique quo error illum autem. Debitis quasi qui recusandae deserunt. Delectus voluptatem a dolor minima officia. Deserunt corrupti quisquam labore dicta eaque. Quis recusandae voluptatibus totam expedita ipsum libero.
Officia ut sunt et corrupti recusandae et. Velit harum natus ut. Omnis rem ut consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...