WF or UBS
Based on the 2026 Q1 M&A rankings, if you have an offer from both, which would you pick?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +273 | Earliest you can get fired | 58 | 1d |
| +254 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 1d |
| +218 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 45 | 1d |
| +215 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 1d |
| +206 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 41 | 2d |
| +131 | Is UBS really that bad? | 38 | 1d |
| +40 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 17h |
| +27 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 8 | 1d |
| +27 | 2026-27 IB Energy Top Banks | 8 | 1d |
| +25 | How do you manage nerves in IB technical interviews? | 7 | 1h |
Career Resources
WF is you have any desire to stay longer than 2 years, UBS if not. Having worked with WF in PE, think their bankers are a bit hit or miss. Worked with WF on a buyside as WF had been a very good lender to us, but process went terribly because it was very clear the MD had no idea what the market for the asset was. On the flipside, have been on a few other WF pitches where the MD's seemed very well-connected and knowledgeable on the companies they pitched. Haven't worked with UBS on anything live outside of leveraged loans, so cannot provide too much color outside of them having a strong leveraged capital markets team.
Just you wait until the WF simps see this. WF is a t10 franchise with great pay, the best culture, and every single MD is very strong. None of the flow comes from their robust balance sheet, and solely is due to their great advisory practice.
WF for sure. Don’t fall for old legacy reputations in 2026
WF easy
WF any day
Honestly think it’s kind of a tie. UBS is still a BB with likely better traction from headhunters despite the crappy deal flow while WF is a growing platform with a huge balance sheet to deploy and win mandates. That said, WF likely has better culture and stability, which are also important considerations
They are no longer officially a BB
UBS still holds better legacy brand name and BB status, will give you access to much better exits than WF (despite both platforms being similar in strength nowadays)
Yeah like Bear Sterns (many UBS people ironically worked with some). Don’t rely on legacy brand, Wells is dominating
I exited from UBS recently and I 100% would take WF over UBS if I could go back in time. WF has better cash comp, a better culture, and is on a better trajectory. It’s a better place to spend 2 years. Meanwhile, UBS has been on a downward spiral since the CS acquisition and the majority of the groups suck. It was an awful 2 years. For a UMM PE exit, is a top group at UBS marginally better? Yes. For 90% of people, would they be better off at WF? Also yes.
Also if you want to be a career banker, WF is hands down a million times better.
-
YOU DO NOT SELECT YOUR FUTURE EMPLOYER ON THE BASIS OF LEAGUE TABLES.
I've written other posts on why.
Just curious but where did you end up going/choosing?
Quia architecto voluptatem corporis dolorem. Et consequuntur dolorem qui.
Laboriosam voluptatem tenetur aut et sit natus eveniet. Neque nostrum repellendus dignissimos asperiores ipsa iusto id fugiat. Eaque quia est error et commodi quisquam. Beatae velit nobis nulla suscipit rem nulla vel. Optio quibusdam nihil fugiat est molestias vel.
Rerum est repellendus quas voluptate corrupti. Quis dolorem necessitatibus quo ipsam ab. Consectetur eos modi amet necessitatibus molestiae quis. Sapiente quos aut sint accusantium et illum dicta. Natus ea repellendus sapiente veritatis. Temporibus quo et nemo repudiandae molestiae animi tempore. Voluptas esse iure provident autem accusamus rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...