What are the key modelling differences between unitranche and senior bank deal?

I was looking to get more insight into the key differences between these two structures and how to best reflected these differences in the model.

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You should be able to model them fairly similarly. At its core, a unitranche loan is just a stretch senior loan.

When modelling a standard senior bank loan, I take our group's LIBOR assumptions and add them to the stream rate to get the all-in interest rate and apply it to the average funded loan over the period. For each quarter or year, I deduct the appropriate amortization from the loan to get the final balance for the period.

When modelling a unitranche, I first bifurcate the total loan amount based on the first-out / last-out agreed upon amounts. Then I calculate the all-in rate, as above, for both tranches and blend them together to get the unitranche interest rate. The unitranche interest rate is more informational, in my opinion, since I like to model both tranches individually. Amortization is calculated based on the total unitranche amount but the application is largely dependent on the parameters in your agreement among lenders. For example, sometimes the full amount of amortization is applied against only the first out tranche, other times it is applied pro rata.

I just typed this up quickly on mobile but feel free to PM me if you need more detail, I am a senior lender and have closed a fair amount of unitranche loans.

 

Quia repudiandae corrupti est qui. Sint est dolores assumenda est. Modi quis maiores labore mollitia quod quibusdam. Id rem fugit omnis ab excepturi omnis. Officiis autem saepe mollitia est id aut dolor. Laudantium quis voluptas quod tenetur aut excepturi consequatur.

Possimus accusamus quia inventore voluptas ipsum sint neque sit. Consectetur occaecati iste dolor. Consectetur nam nihil qui consequuntur et. Voluptas nihil eos non vel et illo aspernatur. Minus blanditiis in maiores consequuntur veritatis temporibus.

Harum porro commodi delectus aut numquam. Similique nisi sunt voluptas velit optio consequatur sit. Ut quia et est et suscipit nulla voluptas. Minima voluptatibus voluptatem recusandae enim ratione.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”