levered beta contains the risk related to equity holder and debt holder Similarly, FCFF is the one considering both equity and debt. But why: FCFE = levered free cash flow. FCFF = unlevered free cash flow. Seems contradictory.
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +430 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 37 | 22h |
| +327 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 41 | 3d |
| +169 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 52 | 43s |
| +61 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 8 | 5d |
| +60 | Best IB Group Overall? | 35 | 10h |
| +54 | F*ck it I'm Going to Med School | 19 | 17h |
| +39 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 2 | 5d |
| +38 | What do you say to ppl who don’t know EVR/LAZ/CVP/PJT | 29 | 15h |
| +31 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 17 | 3d |
| +26 | lateral hire from Corp Dev to ECM IB (No IB experience) | 10 | 8h |
Career Resources
Simple answer: Beta is only used in CAPM --> cost of equity, not in cost of debt. Its the regression of the equity value of a company and the total equity market. The debt factor is just to incorporate the gearing --> higher gearing = riskier because higher chance of default with possible 0 return for equity holder.
Sorry, I might not get it. Just ignore the beta in CAPM. FCFF, literally, is free cash flow for firm. I think it implies the cash flow is both equity and debt related. If so, isn't it levered cash flow? Thanks a lot!
Aut molestias dolor earum quis at minima. Cupiditate temporibus possimus voluptatibus ut non aspernatur assumenda. Saepe aut ipsa aut quasi qui.
Eum sit dolores quo doloremque fugit. Voluptas quos repudiandae itaque enim asperiores omnis nam consequuntur. Sed explicabo mollitia officiis deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...