William Blair has been getting some great reviews and sentiment lately on this site. How does insight into performance and environment shape up compared to some of the reviews a year ago when the market was hot?
Does anyone think they are approaching closer to EB status on deals, with many still undisclosed, or is that not the case, given a resilient mid-market software market?
| +439 | Female bankers doing brand deals on TikTok | 116 | 9h |
| +142 | UBS rolling out Enhanced Clean Desk Policy, bans deal toys | 16 | 3d |
| +100 | Starting FT in a city 3 hours away, dad has progressing Parkinson's. Looking for advice. | 8 | 1d |
| +73 | JULY 2026 CHICAGO BANK RANKINGS | 29 | 7h |
| +64 | Restructuring is paradise (a completely unbiased account) | 6 | 4d |
| +37 | Not Treated Well by Other Interns | 20 | 2d |
| +36 | Handling frustration | 5 | 4d |
| +34 | Taking days off as an intern | 17 | 9h |
| +28 | Thoughts on Intrepid - Houlihan Merger | 10 | 3d |
| +27 | IB TikTok Influencers (wehave2wizards) | 9 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
At a competitor bank so here’s my opinion -
They kill mid-market, PE backed software deals. If you have some obscure enterprise software business worth $500M-$2B, they run the market and are probably the best banker in this space. They have great sponsor relationships (look at tombstones on their site).
They don’t do as much of the VC-backed high flyers (that’s much Qatalyst, GS, MS) and are not as good at anything other than sell-side deals to PE firms. Focus is very much on boring, steady growing, profitable firms.
At the low end of the market, they’re competing with HW, RJ, HL, etc. At the higher end they’re definitely competing with (and sometimes winning) vs those top BBs and EBs. Jeff and Gugg big competitors as well. They’ve been doing this for a while and do a lot of repeat business, and the massive tech tailwinds are helping a ton - my bank has lost a few mandates where WB sold the company to a sponsor for a smaller number, and then they win the mandate selling them again for $1b+
It’s a great analyst experience given deals quantity (have friends there) and there are decent analyst protections and good culture. I obviously would take Q/GS/MS/EBs etc over WB, but think their tech group is a really great place to be if you aren’t at one of those top tech banks
Exit opps have lagged the reputation (WB analysts historically haven’t gotten the same looks as say, a JEF analyst even though deal quality is very similar), but heard recent placements have been way better (some really solid UMM exits on top of the usual MM list)
This is really accurate. Only thing I would add, I was in the group—exits I have found were more interest driven versus due to a bias in the market. For reference, of my class I think about half didn’t recruit either staying at the bank or bugging out of the industry entirely. Those that did recruit seemed to land just fine with insight, marlin, GTCR, AKKR, WCAS, Sumeru, turn/river being recent exits. One of my biggest shocks was the amount of great analysts that seem to leave the industry for startups or more low key roles/ corp strat or finance. I think because the analyst experience is, as you correctly mentioned, largely doing sell-sides for obscure $400m-$2B tech companies, many analysts get enamored with going to a startup and chose that route instead of recruiting. This is also combined with what I would describe as non-existent pressure to recruit. Meaning, I didn’t hear anyone talk about recruiting and while it wasn’t discouraged, you were strongly encouraged to stay on as an associate and those that did recruit, did so secretly.
This contrasts with other firms where it seems like some analysts get destaffed functionally during on-cycle and MD’s strongly encourage exits.
Personal take, almost no one I know who exited that group regrets the experience or had difficulty exiting, so it’s a job you should take if you can get it.
You mentioned Gugg -- how would you compare Gugg to Blair? If you know people who are at both shops, similar experience and exit opps? (Especially talking about Chicago office, if you have any info.) Thanks!
Answering this since I’m qualified to.
Gugg’s Chicago office is built off some of the largest rainmakers that were at WB. They basically took the IT services and enterprise IT teams and poached them on including some of the most profitable MD’s that were in WB’s tech group all the way down to analysts who had built great reps with the IT services and enterprise IT teams. It’s a smaller office, so exits are likely way fewer from a number perspective and it’s too early to really make generalizations about the group, but I’m sure it’s about the same as WB.
Have they started FT recruiting? Application went up a while ago but haven't heard anything.
Don't believe so. Had referral from MD and BB SA, so I would be pretty surprised to not even get an interview. Recruiter said process will be way leaner than last year though. Last year there were 20 or so FT spots, but this year it's like 5 or less
Thanks. In same situation, let me know how it goes and I'll do the same
Refreshing to see such accuracy in this thread.
Anyone know recent exits?
Bump
Cupiditate porro exercitationem veritatis sunt. Id officiis et in expedita quasi. Et aliquid consectetur culpa voluptas. Nam atque iusto voluptatem.
Odio quos doloribus velit impedit. Minus quia non deleniti est natus ipsam magnam corporis. Qui nihil qui totam nulla sed nisi. Maiores eveniet quaerat nisi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...